Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02.txt

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 11:36 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195B512D8E6 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IE_jRkojqkBu for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E26112D0B7 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i5so112283654wmg.0 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pLbX4/DMP37CcWlE5th/qaY/OoAiWmUUeFAnwvak91o=; b=yFExbPjzmGWb+UT067Wx+ijl6N/hCmxVuUiZc3q1QgkHDtRXbJexfcMoUeiqT9rpTT 72yuMGtoktQCjQif/n+fiDLBf/3MLebyZkUk0+UwZtjUoEKiXlAYB80/PAYfl5jqyDrP JHNbYTRbQZcFZn42EpvwHOQ2riEI6g04z5AFNhKaDfq8m1ApfNpp0qbUDaYGMHGXCoUK VXEjCgsLeAaoPopa71F/zq40x2b9+GzA4oW5ErRsDxRtQzWoaZMZ1V/gCHSNBf+vnkUO OcvGiU05MenF4GqVWz27s3/M/P7LutbtmU2XqfVsccJd7zRxHA1xQO1rusA1bnAKSEgm BjTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pLbX4/DMP37CcWlE5th/qaY/OoAiWmUUeFAnwvak91o=; b=FjknN30eLli48+9SEm5namwqqYf+CEFmprik7V8v8EJctzFzD8yTX22RY5aSIPdMZB tUHCgF4UedRG83Q6+xeFimRGYwmayiSLjKJ0ikXPYtKzWCDyurulJMLM4yJaJ9cl1vwh Kd+Xevvd3FeUVXVcur8pqirZJuEP7Hu9cICNNN/71F8Grtuh6VduK2D32icRO0U3EcUT GG7GW/hniYH5g0T9J7JJcKIs8IT8JZWrOoNFvb1S6e2YWyy8ox+ey7Gu9z84cHA1p3ry t4UlsY2R1QWlXXxw45CzfidUVyjAgqhcYHRaImCwvE36Bz1HmUxPXTIH0I7P+PjKmDjm f2mQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIz0A28w1lODo7LmcEyFLfoTRNUWm1cGOLQQSu6Ou+ZnTQtiM4dCu54gf9ZkRYT/g==
X-Received: by 10.28.44.131 with SMTP id s125mr35893400wms.61.1468841781165; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (124.25.176.95.rev.sfr.net. [95.176.25.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r127sm3344616wmf.23.2016.07.18.04.36.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
References: <20160616034238.26185.479.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6itvDjZon-=xtgu=MCMsjU1UtL=pXFP6-kuf1AF_w9rn3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6ise43q3d0bVyivMtPn2LYgB2Bu_1--UFzi4SGkewKV8_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAVtDj7npNkWt_F+iQcdp=0StYAtQ=eo7awEzV6uzvikQ@mail.gmail.com> <F5652454-FB70-499A-A93F-4D7E243C88E7@cisco.com> <73bcf544-b2f6-da98-2e73-65654b1bc328@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <F9AF070E-1687-4B8D-8E0E-EBF8E3A2DC6C@cisco.com> <CAC4RtVBcq0mvRKzcdKwZWsVJBtP94qeZrxErfcwO0PSYVUTKFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <464ab68e-9c17-722a-8d80-3f888459c6d7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:36:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBcq0mvRKzcdKwZWsVJBtP94qeZrxErfcwO0PSYVUTKFA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/QsDqfB6P1HZJi_xNt4r3ijSdbW4>
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:36:26 -0000

On 2016-07-17 10:36, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Another month gap/stall...
> Have we checked with TC 39?  Are we still moving forward?

ECMA's JSON specification is redundant with respect to the developer community.

ECMA's JSON serialization specification OTOH, is quite useful [1] and has no IETF counterpart.

Anders

1] https://cyberphone.github.io/openkeystore/resources/docs/jcs.html#ECMAScript_Compatibility_Mode



>
> Barry
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
> <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
>> It should help that we’ve got a draft that says the right thing now.  Matt, with your TC39 liaison hat on, maybe you can forward it to them and see what their schedule is looking like?  Ideally, we’d be able to publish both documents in roughly the same timeframe.
>>
>> --
>> Joe Hildebrand
>>
>>
>> On 6/16/16, 11:48 PM, "json on behalf of Martin J. Dürst" <json-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016/06/17 07:00, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 14:26, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> As the former AD who was part of sorting this out with ECMA:
>>>>> They are supposed to do the same, putting something in their docs that
>>>>> points to ours and says something similar about having the two specs
>>>>> remain converged.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Barry.  Yes, this is what has been agreed to by Ecma TC39.
>>>
>>> Not specific for this, but just a general comment based on experience
>> >from collaboration between different standardization organizations:
>>> Don't expect this to happen overnight. Each organization works at their
>>> own cycles and pace.
>>>
>>> Regards,   Martin.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> json mailing list
>>> json@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> json mailing list
>> json@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>