IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] The text in draft-ietf-json-text-sequence

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 15 July 2014 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35431B2820 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s_pVig_xwHbb for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBDE1B2822 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38FD2007DA12; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=AtFKbxVYJD07Il Xlcp3+DEyt9NI=; b=I3OAIjxUs+A6RtfLEWFmXgGKOIoN/A9nnGLvhvSJFoti80 1LkNJZBv7p/Sfr1rpZJqYGXPzXEmaxX/M5OE5HHiBWxsJqTMrNzPFVUy5GoOX6aJ YQbttTpQHeUq3+opO97VHVaqFwlcfXeD4yaXrOUIDTwFWGY4EWR+RxPG1VBPs=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8CADE2007DA11; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:34:08 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Message-ID: <20140715063406.GD2256@localhost>
References: <FD9026FF-BDC5-451C-ABBC-0608AB63B819@vpnc.org> <20140708011503.GD1447@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140708011503.GD1447@mercury.ccil.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/R9V-HcOZAKRPQ3Y1QmN7UNwLvY0
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] The text in draft-ietf-json-text-sequence
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:34:09 -0000

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:15:04PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Paul Hoffman scripsit:
> 
> > - Do you feel that the protocol will be significantly broken if it
> > uses LF as the text separator?
> 
> No.
> 
> > - Do you feel that the protocol will be significantly broken if it
> > uses RS as the text separator?
> 
> No.
> 
> > - Do you feel that using LF or RF as the text separator is essentially
> > the same for the protocol?
> 
> Yes.  (However, it would be bad to allow both.)

Thanks.  I agree, though I think LF is better than RS for various
reasons (given separately), therefore though they are equivalent on some
level, RS is not as useful (not to say harmful) as LF.

Nico
--

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status