IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE8321F88BC; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuaCHwbuNoEl; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB2821F8860; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so3072123eaa.7 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=biFVXEYynVlzkyxybflbdPYzP34rC82Vi0NBWr/vygo=; b=eaueSO40OasDQC+3svhOVHv1kayOq3jWQmRe3zahF8XSFxz/o6k1UgQ5ERBTfpzuAl bhBGCjjszWWtlGVpYfbXLFRecn7ATclQgBBxojFm2tvyn5bji1ZlNOHpq5+TfjopOXHf zzGZeA52RtC80uiLfH49f61hlBA/R8Zd6xohC6Q9fXCLdg8XNzHoBzgZ2u/DgyvUHkaA W0XhlMMl9tLXJ8xiWr+8qZeZqvK1TOK02PckTgmLorA1k/TtKq/ara3rXfOh2vaUuPRR /ngyYWZeNSwDa/VAGh2MAOCKOGylZTVH7W3yxIQc/1AYpP69cD7ijVdJnB2UPR7CD9KJ Szfw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.209.131 with SMTP id s3mr61292462eeo.26.1361312410625; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.1.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhQwfVjOAbFzM7CjO6w2zx70PU8uwukH74nk9tdC_tPhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367477490@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F8975C6@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CAK3OfOi5muC1kBgZHZKCzoVTgQLRLwLmwd3Jnrv_N8AkEkWPkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6is-Hx5aqthQRVrbcCKC0G2R9=OMVCth+ysvzk8J-PYvxA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBD79Bodp8SPosQGr95c2Mh=bVM=BN+SDc9cGjuO4Qr=CA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhQwfVjOAbFzM7CjO6w2zx70PU8uwukH74nk9tdC_tPhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:20:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CALcybBAUkQ4g7riYBj-LTSXmmX2WxiK4CSpXnHTBp884JwfiAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:20:12 -0000

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
[...]
>
>> OK, I say that, but on the other hand, JSON Schema mandates that JSON
>> values "1.0" and "1" be considered equal for numeric validation. This
>> could also be viewed as a form of normalization...
>
> Indeed.
>

Note however that JSON Schema is not the only I-D in that case. JSON
Patch says this too
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-10#section-4.6).

--
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email