Re: [Json] The London meeting

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 09 March 2014 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493AE1A0268 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.208
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FRT_BIGGERMEM1=2.555, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKD8VnKet5Kh for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C2C1A0262 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.27] (host86-189-7-81.range86-189.btcentralplus.com [86.189.7.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s29G261O044742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:02:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host host86-189-7-81.range86-189.btcentralplus.com [86.189.7.81] claimed to be [192.168.1.27]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6isSe2pBmK4CH9ugrEwiVNSOxf8P2ezsq+YLgCRgonORJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 16:02:05 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7087186A-DA29-41A1-9D4F-94DA15053D9D@vpnc.org>
References: <CAHBU6isSe2pBmK4CH9ugrEwiVNSOxf8P2ezsq+YLgCRgonORJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/SOQZraFBKkLFqJ2e2hQ7o_Vseh4
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] The London meeting
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 16:02:18 -0000

On Mar 9, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> I was sort of hoping the chairs would take the sense of the WG as to whether we should proceed with a re-chartering based on I-JSON + maybe nomenclature.  There was lots of discussion on the bits of I-JSON that need discussion, but very little on “is this worth specifying?”
> 
> To our chairs: Your sense of this issue?

Matt said (after you had boarded a plane) that we need to discuss this on the mailing list. We have a much larger set of members who don't come to meetings than those in London.

--Paul Hoffman