Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <> Fri, 01 March 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275A221E8037 for <>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:06:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.581
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uC7nIqGYzL8I for <>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A221E8091 for <>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:06:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1201; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362161197; x=1363370797; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=T54dI5CTPa9Rr/D0Gook4KcTivGY9eZqZn779r6pdDA=; b=D563cb7ZzE32vgx5Tf1H+htI/ef0sVHJ4YrsLeOFSBT9/eit86ki6rq4 j6o6BcmJq5VwriU5Lp9YReg9VKqzJbrmmc8CJUtm9q1hU2MaX0HgXeN04 CiVsmmrpf/X3gktRskYiqAotkE4jIvQa8dCOPRMJ1pz7PXPGKLfoA0SAS Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,762,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="182743934"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2013 18:06:37 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r21I6af3016808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:06:36 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:06:36 -0600
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <>
To: Paul Hoffman <>, Barry Leiba <>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
Thread-Index: AQHOFoa1mtOhGFIzGkOoTld8oagPt5iRfM4A//+UZQA=
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:06:35 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:06:38 -0000

I'm fine with the text as it currently sits.

Does the current text give anyone heartburn?  I'll start another thread
mid-next week to make sure.

On 3/1/13 10:31 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <> wrote:

>I made two more small changes to the proposed charter; comments are
>- Changed the community review sentence to say "There are also a number
>of other JSON-related proposals for Standards Track that would benefit
>from review from both the IETF and the larger JSON-using communities
>created by a working group focused on JSON" to indicate that we would
>benefit from JSON-using developers who are currently not active in the
>- Changed the "breaking compatibility" sentence to say "Any changes that
>break compatibility with existing implementations will need to have very
>strong justification and broad support, and will have to be documented in
>the new RFC" to make it clear that the resulting RFC should make any
>changes clear.
>--Paul Hoffman
>json mailing list

Joe Hildebrand