Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title
"douglas@crockford.com" <douglas@crockford.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <douglas@crockford.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FB921F9FA5 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1a0M3ZguLKu8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859CE21F9F10 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxuslxltgw03.lxa.perfora.net (oxuslxltgw03.lxa.perfora.net [172.19.206.5]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LevkF-1UVtXD447T-00ql7k; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:31:45 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:44 -0700
From: "douglas@crockford.com" <douglas@crockford.com>
To: json@ietf.org
Message-ID: <833372357.126503.1371839504953.open-xchange@email.1and1.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2511.1371834130.18953.json@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.2511.1371834130.18953.json@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.2.1-Rev4
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:M8WBZ0k7U9Jut33eMM0F+4WMhqWj1jngfXuq8vfwc6R RSRVGYOR3yR729x298cgjbpXAkDGRtoT90y6/j8/ml8tU5wJ3U 1/NJFITUC8qxUNOuZF8Bs9MoU7EuUdjQGYLIMG/++V2t92AfM1 yABoWDiz26/CFXRzOIea1h+eHDet0ToAmXqFCipTa68DUVdwtH jbOt6myFzUzgJ58A0ljcGKI1v/imopl6aZh4D0/uJd43AsXJ8h fD0CTO/aF4FES6WC7LWfBZ2aGJ6UM7F8VdeZEVdTcYrbzQ7ZVF oHxfgS1La74hjA55o52hkf9otsTO/3u1XHHxaIWXJJz36/uHkp Agj2wdYr0UZ0YU0Nd2yx+lMb30smdON7U/oXAs/BXdVdPvmYNe 8PoU1BTNHleoFi5OB6dWOcAFmaY7kJQpbQ=
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "douglas@crockford.com" <douglas@crockford.com>
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:31:57 -0000
I think this call is premature. We first need to determine which document we are producing. That will determine the title. If we are making The JSON Data Interchange Format document, then it should obviously have that title. But if we are changing the status of the RFC, then it should retain its current title.
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title douglas@crockford.com
- [Json] Consensus call: document title Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Stephan Beal
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Barry Leiba
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Jim Schaad
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Vinny A
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title R S
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title Matthew Morley