Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit

[Norbert Lindenberg <[e-mail]>]

On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:53 , John Cowan wrote:

> Norbert Lindenberg scripsit:
> 
>> Which of these "non-4627-blessed things" is done only by ECMAScript? The
>> one Rob mentioned, producing and consuming primitive JSON values at
>> the root level, can also be found, e.g., in the JSON implementation
>> in Python:
> 
> Yes, but that's just the *implementation* in Python.  The Python *standard*
> (insofar as there is such a thing) has nothing to say about JSON, whereas
> the ECMAScript standard does.  It's standard vs. standard that needs to be
> called out, not standard vs. implementation.

If that's the intent of the proposed new section, it should start with "The ECMAScript Language Specification [ECMA262] requires implementations to ..." rather than "ECMAScript implementations ...".

[ECMA262] Ecma International, "ECMAScript Language Specification", Standard ECMA-262, 5.1 Edition, June 2011,
<http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/Ecma-262.pdf>.

Norbert