IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] REMINDER - WGLC Ends 2013-10-11

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Sat, 12 October 2013 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CBC21F9A71 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nE9sNzPnciEY for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88C621F9CAE for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1VUpVZ-0000kc-9S; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 23:04:49 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 23:04:49 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Message-ID: <20131012030449.GA32619@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF4E2DB@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <078c01cec6c5$d19fc990$74df5cb0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <078c01cec6c5$d19fc990$74df5cb0$@augustcellars.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: 'JSON WG' <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] REMINDER - WGLC Ends 2013-10-11
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:04:58 -0000

Jim Schaad scripsit:

> 4.  The following is technically a change in the grammar, however is
> there a reason why an integer cannot be 00, but 1E00 is legal?  Do we
> want to change the definition of the exponent so that it matches that
> of integer?

I believe that 010 is forbidden because it's not clear if it means
eight (as in C/C++/Java) or ten (as in programming languages from other
traditions).  00 would mean the same thing in either case, but it's more
uniform to simply forbid leading zeros (other than in the value 0, of
course).

-- 
Mark Twain on Cecil Rhodes:                    John Cowan
I admire him, I freely admit it,               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and when his time comes I shall                cowan@ccil.org
buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake.

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email