IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 18 March 2014 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263091A06E8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sn4WvzmiD9MG for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B481A06DA for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s2IFETYo078284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:14:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:14:26 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/Uu9EA9qmIE3B-xjyHJeO840QhE0
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:14:59 -0000

On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2014-03-17 23:17, Matt Miller wrote:
>> Greetings again.  We earlier asked a couple of questions to gauge what
>> the new proposed WG charter ought to contain.  That feedback has been
>> valuable, but has drilled into implementation specifics before a new
>> charter was actually agreed on!  We have been chastised by our AD about
>> this, and for good reason.  We think we already have enough input from
>> the London meeting and the list over the past few days to make the
>> following proposal for a new charter:
>> ...
> 
> What happened to the proposal to add James Snell's json-merge draft to the list of WG items?

I don't remember that discussion. draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch should still be part of AppsAWG; it just needs someone to take over the work.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email