IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 18 March 2014 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4761A06D5 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBTyZXxXKyJd for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABB61A0421 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2IGJakp017927; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:19:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p54890DCB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.13.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5933031B; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:19:36 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <53286BE2.3020409@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:19:31 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 416852371.722982-dc24b6f78a84626e5e551e1791197c4e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82F6EE3B-B659-460C-AD1C-7303D4F53333@tzi.org>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de> <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org> <532864FC.8040700@gmx.de> <CE6D04D1-C063-41E6-A635-3AD8127B6F28@vpnc.org> <5328687D.9050509@gmx.de> <CAHBU6ivhKzENAEkm174=o=QYs8Xj1BS4Rfw0CX_C6bnNP2riNw@mail.gmail.com> <53286A3E.3000907@gmx.de> <53286BE2.3020409@cisco.com>
To: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/W1Kqjvm0lkYoGsaPghxGSIShG7k
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:20:00 -0000

On 18 Mar 2014, at 16:53, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:

> Teams I have worked with are already making use of json-merge-patch,

Are they using exactly what’s in the draft right now (including the somewhat surprising purge_nulls semantics)?
It would help to get some feedback from actual users of this.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email