IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF1921F8881 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.713
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.713 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.736, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsItKvCSoG7r for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB11921F8878 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87571F0078 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=g22c/tTFA4CLMwIsfPlb q+BeHr8=; b=VgT/ccgy4gfT5ctEwRAoTuSWmUapcWViSUfxycq32QcV9UP62hdB Mf0sD74Z2WV6D6lgKVnWmn9hSnFM3I2SVG5AQDfHyW6d+ntdE5XyHwkoj72yXYhE zUHExX/1SYflouvTHhJSOXTQXkN6h08mhRB34X5ADPQw8wJSnO3DSNg=
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B2541F0014 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 17so9342766iea.12 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.152.132 with SMTP id uy4mr9408205igb.62.1361320294890; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.102.201 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367477E41@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <CAHBU6iub4vp2QrcGNmAg+2rz=JhP1x7fW43e5L3gNkuLz442wg@mail.gmail.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F898351@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CAHBU6iuCLnF0L4_S7=44Uy8mY+QWmG-Z9QfYMzMb+QNUgqCs0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1361319479.9790.36.camel@pbryan-wsl.internal.salesforce.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367477E41@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:31:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOh1tfuSjF=xa5hgeMqBZdmMao0og8cZScdEH0-hLxUt7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "Paul C. Bryan" <pbryan@anode.ca>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:31:37 -0000

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> As background, the JOSE specs require that equality comparisons for members
> be done as a comparison of Unicode code points, with no normalization or
> case folding performed.  See
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08#section-8.3.

Was that because normalization is hard, mostly useless (most input
strings will already be NFC anyways), or for some other reason?

Nico
--

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status