Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B484C1A0610 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk6x7hdEDbtq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F0C1A060C for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3EA508072 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=52S7ZEXWOF853yMv8h3n 0UNx6yQ=; b=E3r1EGCsYQTvdLQb8SoxuSQTB4q1xgkT/26YczyLAXwG7d4XVyWV 1ElS1Agmy/1sf5x2wV7XjF0Mf8R5j870S3rQVeUlpoZufO7vfs0uXnhrHcZ03Fsz x2EubmjtbY1cHXK7hwRLbnsjytb+Cfrm2FO8mNUOpTbkGBKqg3FKhME=
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3EDD508064 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so976235wgh.19 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9Nq95Zl7+z88K45oee5S/WoDnN9wK3hNoKy4py7BzdE=; b=jOP+9bByxyD2IJ6yXb0Fue998qUUFuMRyqFh/eym88/t19X61oCcO36K4V2KNMD8rk QwSSEyYBjdM+YMQ+G9TYF9zQo0CYmysB6602xXg3X2+LidU1x9XDrLqbzV5ut+orrf5+ MGfJYzBXMtrH5OU+axR25o0oNApCrA0pMWNevZOtH6B86pRysqsTXxulCbskwzHX6xZW 1wKrrBPfjOpm2jgonM07IWJe4KrH6wgxxM0CwU9LumG9kHjBpj725wC+k13WypJsHVdy cW6u0qnE3jqw7KXVWKIe5l3H2axS27bzsmkNH+RPENFNdtKXFoIsyv//3TtbZzQl04HR Kxdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.36.8 with SMTP id m8mr4387101wij.42.1392860347299; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.108.132 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:39:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <45357ADE-75B2-4D9D-AFEC-66B84E5D2320@mnot.net>
References: <CAHBU6itzQ0rzU3EUYUqzm2qhx03qk1mpx2sehS_zeiw1ypcEgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhfjkbq6eREkt=MBVL1C9ubh-6My3Lvg-mnOxD0+cpN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6isZbew8O1HJ+XcFsMCR42iDoO_uemPXVwa3=vM5A=MngA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOgmVsNJqrqCfsD7h37axssOoaX3DGHqO=bTn5bWrA+MFA@mail.gmail.com> <A4B53816-6FBF-4A37-8BC9-F0A9D0867BCD@tzi.org> <CAC4RtVDLQ3q5KxG+jDYfDB09JZUOBcojTR3ebxhr1QUOXLeEvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiCHt2NLW8AV93Tzh=hUXGT7SWM8W5zXSehmBF+nEMCkw@mail.gmail.com> <rvcag9tv4cn6jioncd1rmmc19gcm59l6e9@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAK3OfOgOghu_4jxHuoDSnHbyJJRu=xa_YBmgO92CMspMQApceg@mail.gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1153B778363@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CAHBU6is7iH3CQE4uH55iszCAQ1afDrX8MYVXkJY8cJJ96P+wBA@mail.gmail.com> <45357ADE-75B2-4D9D-AFEC-66B84E5D2320@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:39:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOh-anxPChGtJvw9awSUREuBahnGqEoC1g2DF4sxP+z1Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/WJvaowlpVJMuhq98ncgeEyXiP1w
Cc: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:39:13 -0000

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> +1 to the hm. ;)
>
> I wouldn't object if someone wanted to establish a WebIDL profile, etc., or just refer to it in their spec.
>
> I would have a problem if we started requiring people to use it.

Absolutely, there should be no requirement that people use it (or any
alternative).  I don't think anyone has proposed such a requirement.
The only proposal is that the WG charter permit the WG to take on work
items for schema documents.

Nico
--