Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i-json-02

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 16 July 2014 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7031B28AD for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJ17wO5lWDHs for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14E41B28AB for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id im17so1909103vcb.3 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=pDaQJaORIY1/qskRY480zSsgByxKfWmmXVDtj1oEFuQ=; b=YDsI3sOzpuqowA1pzq4PiYOIwbMYRpo/iuiCCikV1xAUAS0qepTAlX0CPf2SOVxVOx gQDn0hvoR+IqNfrdGBlhC27KPhyxlPGwfTRbO/Fekmk+Jp66gyPNpWoCeoab7A9NyY+N 1D9h/AxXA/c55EooJoV7O9IUFgtn5BKh2U5PO07W3PT0efAujJ//1Gwv/RFiDzYLJjvH qWUnbBFsgaQzhGHFx4B/mBOPL+9TxuZUyfkgR6w/abhjRIpRFz2pAV3QAkktwk/2xJG2 GgT8dmP9bofAVPjnfadaYC/Ye6wU0V4mLS13G+BHKyJ27G+xnJn5L7AW3MHqzbbBf0xh +NWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLB540fFJkqnpvxZa5rpTiU7lkrevmludvmTSSVa+R/kYJQuOChyNonh8ShYlxgcyKPS3Y
X-Received: by 10.52.241.43 with SMTP id wf11mr7140090vdc.69.1405522469495; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.221.49.199 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32]
In-Reply-To: <02d801cfa104$8cdda1f0$a698e5d0$@gmx.net>
References: <53B21F69.7010101@cisco.com> <53C066AE.9050104@cisco.com> <0c3601cf9fa6$6f79bb30$4e6d3190$@gmx.net> <CAHBU6iuZk8XU1ctYyLJzWBQ_5G7AKeMJn4X9NuaJxjhVu2+3Hw@mail.gmail.com> <02d801cfa104$8cdda1f0$a698e5d0$@gmx.net>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:54:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isqY8e6HbXWOSZRCLhn5gVryyLLRERnbU0ZxAnL1c_sjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133f95884bb3304fe50b335"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/XgvLNLkpHcEEiDdRoRwC7NX5KP4
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i-json-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:54:33 -0000

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
wrote:

> On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:40 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> > Is there an example of such a profile proving useful to application
> > builders?
> We defined some profiles for JSON-LD [1] which make it possible for app
> developers to request the data to be serialized in a specific way (there
> are typically multiple ways to serialize the same graph).
>

​That’s nice in theory; are there any actual real applications that actual
real people actually really use that derive any benefit from this?​




>
>
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Markus Lanthaler <
> markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 12, 2014 12:35 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
> > > Note that Working Group Last Call ends on Monday (07/14).  What has
> > > been brought to the list to date is:
> > >
> > > * correction on the reference to RFC 7149 (should be RFC 7159)
> > > * some discussion about a profile URL
> > >
> > > We want to hear from as many as possible, even if the comment is
> > > "looks good to me".
> > As already said, I think it would be a good idea to mint and register a
> > profile URI.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#iana-considerations
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>


-- 
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)