Re: [Json] I-JSON Tpic #2: Top-Level

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 20 May 2014 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD5F1A07A4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UctwI_wDEMQ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C551A07AC for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-90.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s4KKosqY058979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:50:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-90.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.90] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6ivpG_H=UFd1fAQednN3Q2vvJtw5DD150GnRjq+Ar3bbTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:50:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B8099FF7-F3DF-408B-91A5-5F061AB981D4@vpnc.org>
References: <535EB119.4000908@cisco.com> <CAHBU6itycQmqzAuxWyrFZ_v=fHdenm2csyAqtUGGu+vteh6=yQ@mail.gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1154581E82F@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CAHBU6iuqosV91W6CJyow_eaKdCNm_VOairJysuLS8mrWV+HM9g@mail.gmail.com> <ABB2BA00-6A21-4710-A1F5-49D4FB469E8F@vpnc.org> <CAK3OfOig8y5KpYZ86KrMPxrJOYC_hLBew_nmyneHCC2mXX+tag@mail.gmail.com> <537BB89E.2040305@cisco.com> <CAHBU6ivpG_H=UFd1fAQednN3Q2vvJtw5DD150GnRjq+Ar3bbTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/Xs3dQkySqbkEu827T-H2tAIbZ2Y
Subject: Re: [Json] I-JSON Tpic #2: Top-Level
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:50:58 -0000

On May 20, 2014, at 1:27 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> For what it’s worth, this particular consensus excludes me.  
> 
> 1. The goal for I-JSOn is to maximize interoperability, and there is software out there coded to 4627 which will fail when presented with 42 or true; so interoperability suffers when you do that. 
> 2. For the type of work the IETF is engaged in, Must-Ignore is almost always a win in protocol designs, and thus we would do well to encourage the use of JSON that makes this straightforward.

<no hat>

The goal of this document is to maximize interoperability. RFC 4627 and other specs had the rule that JSON texts had to be objects or arrays. Restricting JSON texts *in this profile* maximizes interoperability better than RFC 7159 did.

This profile is not meant to be correcting RFC 7159; it is meant to be giving a profile that maximizes interoperability.

--Paul Hoffman