Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB621AE03C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:07:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R88Dd2TZqfYr for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0483D1AE048 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6C410059; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:07:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=1zz20NtlcLgSGW zxn4z7A4pZQgQ=; b=FuwHPVqjLNu6w0NvVfyrq3uiN/7j+W12X5OniGrse9CO+P rFhXfIdsNgNXBRVzQX5rJuDYMjUzUC8QWp8J2cTOQHF7sLMB1qI79gV8O6BT5Zxx kti1AtkLgrsta0oQBoyzJe83qWYRtkCk529g88VpQj3/j4EA61uo5Jw/bIYA4=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 682D510058; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:07:34 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Message-ID: <20131126230730.GH21240@localhost>
References: <20131121165615.GA12138@mercury.ccil.org> <CANXqsRKrcR54TzSFng0ysyTV60-uZZ7QQ-G4xJOB0gO29C7-Ag@mail.gmail.com> <54E53D571E5E4589B2E9FA17DC816002@codalogic> <CANXqsRJi8dv0Giw7CZWP=10qEJEXGyRTb0HFnE9MpeAxc2_0rA@mail.gmail.com> <20131126160127.GE20755@mercury.ccil.org> <CAO1wJ5Qz2-vue_OGp79JZ+DW0ELofwdh8vy=9UZk53SMYs1bOg@mail.gmail.com> <20131126172410.GC21240@localhost> <mev999tgjoao5cj84fuk4t8pvi4t9pj6hs@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <20131126220036.GG21240@localhost> <95E46767-DBBF-489F-83BD-80BEC697C999@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <95E46767-DBBF-489F-83BD-80BEC697C999@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:07:39 -0000

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:00:33AM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> [...]

Did you actually disagree with any of my recommendations?  Please point
out which.  I'll repeat them here to make it easy:

    We should strongly encourage UTF-8 (require it, even, for parsers).
    We should not forbid other encodings -- at least not UTF-16 nor
    UTF-32 -- though we might agree to say nothing about them.

Do you want to say anything about other encodings?  What would that be?
And why?

Nico
--