Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality

Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cromis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8358E21F9EBA for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.873
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.873 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qCfcBeN6azhq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC63421F9EB8 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id d13so1018255qak.2 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=POvGz2GV0vJf2Lnu8chDEUw6GDZEQg0rk09wWe8fvak=; b=BqV4FL/fkeawuknqWeVzabw3ySpa/Jvy6v512k5dofmE2xxztvvhyxwFZbuWi94Df5 5P057Z2ca3q7FrLtJAq9m1txA81F27A7bf5pJyAVw/uad8hlx/FWWR6Z0WKGOnyCzuuR Ixn9kY8nC7Mp4HUiq2Y90ReuhuGaWYkKAuM1dBKn7XgssQZ1g6bwYZsXqWziDIviS1vI rbV7/A31IwYaDzta6sIKwap6x7etU+B/MWAselw5xnyYtA4lwzJQqfXSrQhIBeZIRkNn hPNISUNzBfFOAtCOPOofjPt/AbobsFaEQbWWLVPosZnrSirqVyCkyoH/DWHdaVvPzymc 5kww==
X-Received: by 10.224.123.68 with SMTP id o4mr7696437qar.106.1371856540348; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cromis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.76.42 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iv8wGJQGpsswSf0GgkN6uQAXP8XFRbabjzWnNSJoifQzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DB211AD8-6BBA-4D95-9B6E-F00AA69E584E@vpnc.org> <6BCAAC4F-2B45-43BA-A40B-96F3369A5851@tzi.org> <CAO1wJ5SzsOvj2voaeM83G2FxmEwBSREHP5YtE5T8G-mgoM4jNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv8wGJQGpsswSf0GgkN6uQAXP8XFRbabjzWnNSJoifQzw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:15:20 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lcxe4y2k6NyqTfsH1ErO4da2Ka0
Message-ID: <CAO1wJ5S7gvqJUydhfUkweffOxm+DcnEgZVciUVvnzj2gHYrAow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6bc92c5522104dfb23dbc"
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:15:41 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> Hm, I think this is useful.  I’ve seen people go off the rails trying to
> be overly clever comparing strings, so this in effect is just telling them
> not to overthink. -T
>

Is this definition of equality needed elsewhere in the document though?
Standing alone it seems a little odd - there's no discussion how to compare
two numbers, two objects, or two lists for equality, so why are
strings-used-for-names special?