Re: [Json] Response to Statement from Ecma International TC39

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 05 December 2013 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4510C1AE384 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:33:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvsmmwKQFQGK for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7C81AE381 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB56WSjZ010329; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:32:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p548901B4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.1.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C7407BD; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:32:25 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <52A01BBA.2040809@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:32:20 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <242F63FA-EB68-42C0-A42E-C25E7C8576D5@tzi.org>
References: <C7707CE2-C43E-4171-AE96-9FAFDCE53317@cisco.com> <20131205044253.GH21240@localhost> <CAK3OfOiXdOpe+=DzxgD7HeyN0UTtMCiu+b3Cep4d1ftQPjrxww@mail.gmail.com> <52A01BBA.2040809@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "Matt Miller, (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Subject: Re: [Json] Response to Statement from Ecma International TC39
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:33:00 -0000

On 05 Dec 2013, at 07:22, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:

> repeatedly got messages from es-discuss-owner@mozilla.org

Yep.  And some messages from “over there” read like they came out of a bubble.
Running a discussion on several mailing lists at the same time is never a great idea, but it gets much, much worse when a subgroup of the participants never gets to hear input from outside their own subgroup.

Grüße, Carsten