Re: [Json] JSL: Clarifying purpose, and renaming it to JDDF

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Sun, 01 September 2019 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5904812008F for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id obK0hdDNKVyn for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5096F120074 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id c10so666767wmc.0 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 15:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3Wu2F9EY8oSzLFNzYj86IQUK4cD0jXmHL3GTJPYykg4=; b=EaMeq9BF8Wj/0i6c9SK5hU+6NLXAP28OOqwe5r7ruJnpwDfg5BFoyJg4txDETO06y5 Z38TrAPhgTSKlheMVmfBPg5chpE1jQpYKWVTgShN6vdzOU81VlmHrS/fs3X8Gs36+W2R JcptZtYjfxcTlU1VcUN+HZNVwqaGEAnCaXowPSK3WGcafDK2tx/y8BqH731d3uqQpquA tbk+9oJKYf1rf3YNTjRHvvayfcdZE2NUQ6mpgMZ5v68hojIOzHq9bKOFCyhQilTvct4g J/EarZN3d6ysGl0ijKa441PBVaFwVtRPsYPRFhJb5dRSvFSv7EMESRL0DBtVUapgO7hj Cs4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Wu2F9EY8oSzLFNzYj86IQUK4cD0jXmHL3GTJPYykg4=; b=Y0zOdhY6v0e1N9AbEZ9LvxdSEAO6H2aB1Xv14qiSgqMr0aawcKOmBReFXRhM8+FtrM l+/gptaT3BaJN01TBI/cSSoLiwgyiTiyobpRLvZ4MOHcoXKeoYHlTsTLUQZ6ObTZBFv0 Ah+yddmDlpPcRbxqrf8YWcmxrOH6wQIIwGZSwhWZKq2XiLeM048P9E7BwJKZTT/shQZf xkktnN40ylL+L38w0JIjWWuY51Gs4Dhxe+6zm4fQIXXiblC7nOj3mvYR4hLQX8owoTO+ TOgqOZWXsiRz0P2GBQDnPdETemnNIsC+r9okV/4N/jTLyoXYGef1JHpTqSZACY9vXUuc r9KQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUG6rvrJY2SIBHMpwWKJZguhyR1urEqP+O4midCAi5MX2cTyBGC LZelvC2oXVfNhGdRr5qCrofsl+zt1qN6epBhyZlilQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwp8t1uC/l+eWFy92ecE3OEWobToXodane1SIR+D2xtCzWG62tsrmu3sbKcvYF1HuAfAkdwkL6onDCau1jqqHI=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9889:: with SMTP id a131mr11231817wme.38.1567377722842; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 15:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJK=1Rj6zW_MffKvsOiQh28KY5yDeoALGSYqve+vGj52s1Owag@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2gp_Qw2=J8vuimyVAta=cZEos9qmzLd-RsK3czkM5LvFSi7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJK=1Rh927YqLgqhewT+EOEjtbpFsVvUnE=9cr+ng0+CY-7rSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJK=1Rh927YqLgqhewT+EOEjtbpFsVvUnE=9cr+ng0+CY-7rSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 18:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_SS3yvk4TMXAuuhKmjv1wucycOp9MKS+vKwn4tj1oqp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com>
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000066396b05918590b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/dAKvP585UCUNivOzISQf7WTrZJY>
Subject: Re: [Json] JSL: Clarifying purpose, and renaming it to JDDF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 22:42:06 -0000

Section 2.3 says that extensions can't be validation-related, so a length
limitation would most certainly be a matter of validation.

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 6:28 PM Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com> wrote:

> Fixed-length strings and arrays both sound like things one could
> implement with extensions, no?
>
> Tuples are a very sensible suggestion. But I wonder if we can live
> without them? I very much want to keep JDDF as small as possible.
>