IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969B21274D2 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyJxKNKQ-rDc for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F97126D05 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 123so22526384pgj.1 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mTolAwUvq29ILQ+5katHVRsAJrCkXBcwLmXF47cac2c=; b=MlEF61yniHzD9CdDranbXVLsf7ImYFdYEUx4Sa4VsRwCry3AvOWzoWTtrnyEzXZjIK gWsJDLvbQLlUErSKDlfUltFA1/5MoXh4xhHz05W7mln2tKcd/f46xv2dgs1AyZAQF6Tn KJxJxyxp6h1397K+itvMdyrMsVSqJYOyLeH+HTdrJIVnBSl4MF+BmY8kqqHjMA+NZSxC Sp6wgECRAeG90VR4z8VYHNUEdBDtlkOjeqR4X47kK9Q+vfasmJIbDIeR1js8Y1rmRip4 sLQGTakV34IIPWMBAg9Kw48pTtaKlMUIa09tbW9u/lxQ4BkESqxzVdQJmW9MIt8+0oJp n8sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mTolAwUvq29ILQ+5katHVRsAJrCkXBcwLmXF47cac2c=; b=Hx669j3xpts8x4KivlSwNTRi3Ksrm9IL7FQQPIZLgQCmtoufg4UtGaN9E4zqEOa5lG CFjAmxhs//XdFHFm/v0TtHCdf7O23TxgJBDO0QSb3vHopvXetWX3i8YsD/H7hgddBvCB wk2/6ri9uKVCEeZTyfPav5so8Vv7iXiuRPNYL34C9SezVRED3Vg6SG1US7yj1cjx2dZU iBXn9Yq4rJHKNDccCuO8HWxlObf+sQf1FwDg4V9zqpQOa9gEjRBNfihlL/+pGuSpiDGw r74zjp49EIDGjItx82yiGrn81J73/oUJXdE3fMPL6u62lPkWamVTvTLR/FWZ8feZeL3c SeJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1129yVNCH/C2TNeDnnX+TuS1ssdyrfuOdCP5VBcjzK4BEfUwVtVE c62X5S6KYYos1YAg60C4zeIyvDx4fJVP
X-Received: by 10.98.201.75 with SMTP id k72mr609966pfg.99.1500431079541; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.155.42 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.86.134.32]
In-Reply-To: <47640061-e387-ef14-4ed6-c1c203c3c2fb@gmx.de>
References: <e69d7c21-85cb-45f4-c0c2-34c624e63049@outer-planes.net> <b74cb31b-8e04-17d0-548a-fc164ce07c05@outer-planes.net> <20170417175627.GK23461@localhost> <10B651F1-7FE0-484D-BD2E-FD146BC5FB04@tzi.org> <eabbccb0-8d15-d595-7cd0-37acc0621c57@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <6eb23f90-6623-7888-bc1c-6640a9dababc@codalogic.com> <61bfad2b-850d-a11f-e80b-d5ed9ccb4dc9@codalogic.com> <08a88696-65ef-da05-0d77-1a07d04ebfc8@outer-planes.net> <bb9fead6-23e7-8c1d-bc80-b60c81c4b89a@codalogic.com> <6f047d01-ad72-59ab-9d34-20a8177ab3af@outer-planes.net> <be4d9f12-a4be-3723-e52a-56a60722a75f@gmx.de> <a3805f67-620b-67f0-9c06-c865b71029e7@codalogic.com> <bb1ef6a8-506c-344b-b903-980ed50ad2d3@gmx.de> <44b4523a-5e4b-ccad-af96-931d8b9ad1c2@codalogic.com> <ac1d1b68-67e7-c19f-a556-280df73f465b@outer-planes.net> <db3e4d88-d3bc-2ab5-fd8d-0a9ed90865e9@codalogic.com> <CAHBU6itmYDyBfz0qqr0LAUTuvdR1oBSUnz7VSie=pZRva=Ynzw@mail.gmail.com> <787b7e15-ea97-b458-c886-d21c4dd02803@outer-planes.net> <47640061-e387-ef14-4ed6-c1c203c3c2fb@gmx.de>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:24:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isAfXo0me-hvGiD2gY=2Kgwji=bGgd-TiXYLW1H4+96hQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c187c3a81af600554a255d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/dC3NVN68MbqWhB-frFXhskzRiys>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:24:42 -0000

Oops, OK, I can bash out a quick draft, it's straightforward, will do so
unless chairs yell Stop.

However, I'm not going to be in favor of taking this to RFC status until we
hear that ECMA will proceed with the reconciliation.

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 2017-07-18 10:27, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I see consensus for the updated text below.  A note to the RFC editor is
>> added to ensure publication does not move forward until section 8.1 is
>> updated, and the change noted in the appendix.
>> ...
>>
>
> 1) I'm OK with the change.
>
> 2) I'm *not* OK with the way it's being executed:
>
> - there should have been a new Internet Draft to review
>
> - we are making an important normative change (that can make existing
> usages of JSON non-compliant) without getting IETF consensus for that change
>
> - we're putting the RFC Production Center in charge to maintain our text
> (because the note to the RFC Editor does not say what to put into Appendix
> A)
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>



-- 
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email