Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level

[John Cowan <[e-mail]>]

Tatu Saloranta scripsit:

> My main concern is with UTF-16. My understanding is that for "Big 5"
> languages its use make sense, from efficiency perspective. I do not
> have data on this; in XML space document test sets had non-trivial
> amount of content in various encodings.

See <http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/unicode-over-60-percent-of-web.html>
which indicates that about 80% of Google-findable web content is in
Unicode, when you count in pure ASCII documents.  I asked Mark Davis,
and he said that UTF-16 was much less than 0.1%.  Of course, in absolute
terms that's a lot of documents.

-- 
Man has no body distinct from his soul,              John Cowan
for that called body is a portion of the soul        [e-mail]
discerned by the five senses,                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the chief inlets of the soul in this age.  --William Blake