Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 01 March 2013 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CEF21F90D5 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4HiRL0kYQJQ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF5411E80C5 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r21GacAP009444; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:36:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1362155802; bh=SmOxRZ6QHUl5rsXsaJwKe4mA1GGk6ZOgl0Ay+f0r0VE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=U28NHkdyvsGkInBr8h6MI4zfVGNpnqerYrPjKPqCES1JH5VTfy3UHAB7jD8NUV3Hh tDukWIwQ1dEM87Wwa39SUNDqkzy6A/YKinpo5wZY6cqJ0dbLcj7Cicq5ifQlyeRHKD Io/+RjDB3Op13pehFNcbX9MONX0HGRfmWPWRXnGg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1362155802; i=@resistor.net; bh=SmOxRZ6QHUl5rsXsaJwKe4mA1GGk6ZOgl0Ay+f0r0VE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Accjo7nvj0JDDFKf5yp8b18OugePloxc2azvrJh0nU8kXLLgHZ+1mo+mTXg2XwTyU 2opJIdrOzwiK6swLT4dDXgr+rvJQ6FYxkCWTykI+Jw5AaZ0i2rWd3F9djdT4bHGlo+ FK2BbxTPpSkCxDdBEdiW8/H/ORlG5//iHiVabDZI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130301065826.0c11c700@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:01:12 -0800
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCWPp1LA_NCqdzpRetPbsoZ=fBb0APWr8=MoJqe8RxkTQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228170825.09fcfa20@elandnews.com> <CAC4RtVCWPp1LA_NCqdzpRetPbsoZ=fBb0APWr8=MoJqe8RxkTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:36:51 -0000

Hi Barry,
At 05:49 01-03-2013, Barry Leiba wrote:
>Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one item: make
>4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to add any other
>items, which would be listed as individual work items in any recharter
>proposal?

Yes to both questions.

Regards,
-sm