IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter

Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> Sat, 15 March 2014 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dch@jsonified.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC881A017D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXhJ8EobywdR for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com (mail-ee0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1EC1A017B for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so2586732eei.28 for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jsonified.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=gyOMUbgBFGggqqTJ9dACGO4SEo1i2nG5bwftfGeg0VE=; b=F7efgTDVkXUQdWLuKbhagN9efHwpo41h0KWpsijBPV1NZB+gM50UVfa3zYTkStyv30 /ArRD9atJCq1IU854uhGh/sTolDgTO0qgmGQN8LuGgYkQORCZ+nJS71PoTo7f2lh/TQP Bs9NegYGjLr0bsqIqDp28JdIJ33pGZrnNKJ5A=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=gyOMUbgBFGggqqTJ9dACGO4SEo1i2nG5bwftfGeg0VE=; b=SD241zTI2qq1blahwm6yPlSdD1HJxOPbWmzOfXB9QiHVj+CU5EGgh+dBJRDKuC0Eaf B1CJdnWbBTTTxyVgRu5FYWA6hhR9JrvrTo/c1yS3Xvu9eixMGlBKGSTW+k0guqNibFC0 r2W7NjjzCLdMM60Yi3WYziuxip/ON1vBQJi0vZ8XfNYbkrHbe3fJneMQnsLy1QtNfJug EWOB5qHNp0fZsBbx7xB5+tMPzXYMx2nhtJAR3rZBhClmaFmz6g/lhgP6wsQCiAwK+cxr BD8Ta0d5C7hGgtCRYuUM4NaonWtw2E9OXZi27G8PnM2Rez+XuNk8GeEUuc5YFaFXrMF+ s3Hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkm8893sfnuQObozPIFMs0qPla4EqETfPIm/7PrOkQlfok8lugqFCAHikLluzCE40RGBeV+
X-Received: by 10.14.148.134 with SMTP id v6mr45190eej.115.1394906044837; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from akai.jsonified.com (chello084112019176.2.11.vie.surfer.at. [84.112.19.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 43sm26215426eeh.13.2014.03.15.10.54.03 for <json@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:53:56 +0100
From: Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
To: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <etPan.532493b4.6b8b4567.4bd@akai.jsonified.com>
In-Reply-To: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com>
References: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (233)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/df-W2UTW4ZfpTSabNzemtmep2_s
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:59:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:54:15 -0000

On 15. März 2014 at 00:22:16, Matt Miller (mamille2@cisco.com) wrote:
> The chairs are seeking comment on whether we should adopt I-JSON
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bray-i-json-01) as a WG item in our
> charter. Remember that adopting this draft does not mean it is done;
> changes can happen based on the consensus of the WG.

+1 yes please.

> Note that the current draft does *not* have the new MIME type nor the
> reserved field name that was heavily debated in London; that could be
> added later if there is WG consensus to do so.

FWIW I attended the Friday session in London; my main concern was having an interoperable approach that *didn’t* require developing an application/XXX+i-json for each application. 

--  
Dave Cottlehuber
Sent from my PDP11

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email