Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4681A00B8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuEX6Kl1DXJR for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C3E1A04B8 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ks9so754279vcb.25 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nlC1HgHAbcMOR6ZYd12Iy+BFdDU0w79mUZvQbHnqAek=; b=XTlaLvrmG9TYUNPdQ3Yu679LuL/DJyaZngPWubb5It9LQj6AKrJC0Il5wX0fKZ5t69 N+j3OvJ4Capl0LRiQWSk+GNi7GTONdZnOizRYG8covtzpdLzHZDNiSl3qPU6Umhd40Ow qEcThQeVdrl2ziRMCW20DOrzgsOsto0K59m9HWO+5Hl8oIFQvSliuMpfhW7c+3pv7wVd MKGBsZYBZq1VLCe3tuvqK7JxNhEtAozzjr//RzkkFrLhdkPPtyDdYELpT5YDs+Hwi71G /IwUGLh98wk80WeUppS09pyeltPJieQ3rn5DTvjgLj0DWwpmVP9lkLjYqhCVw6uaGB0h EHAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHNnsc6W7vfMqtUkk/kY749pcxIokOcCBcO4o74uDw65yK6g7Vy+I330M3XqfIv838TvN0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.55.133 with SMTP id vy5mr26262167vcb.17.1392833432625; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [172.19.244.31]
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhfjkbq6eREkt=MBVL1C9ubh-6My3Lvg-mnOxD0+cpN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C87F9B96-E028-4F0E-A950-B39D3F68FFE7@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwhUh_yN-hzaoDWfrO_H2iGvYvj99BCE4EcYmgqCPqXoVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itpttXBfVQGKw=u==k_XSdrht81+m_YDNZP6RM+=9CNow@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOjHkBFOzJSx=bhhoQJ8Z2bWyEXK52dNyYGWVb9FAj99ow@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itzQ0rzU3EUYUqzm2qhx03qk1mpx2sehS_zeiw1ypcEgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhfjkbq6eREkt=MBVL1C9ubh-6My3Lvg-mnOxD0+cpN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:10:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isZbew8O1HJ+XcFsMCR42iDoO_uemPXVwa3=vM5A=MngA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113376fefbb90604f2c64d92
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/e-BLhG3SB-aJENGAK1Db8WNoFNc
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:10:38 -0000

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>wrote;wrote:


> I really want any JSON schema to be expressed in JSON itself


Reasonable sounding, but the resounding success of RelaxNG’s non-XML syntax
(which surprised me, for one) makes this sort of idea less self-evidently
true.