Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 18 July 2016 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6222512D649; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTc9erD_cSyh; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AB812DE66; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.176.193] ([31.133.176.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFR2O-1bbDPu0jdE-00ELZb; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:11:50 +0200
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com> <876b2dda-340c-c0e6-6323-a736a1e8e504@gmx.de> <9aa67689-aeba-4b28-86c2-04bd03e8941b@gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c7dbe81b-6d7b-4dfb-33ba-f13f499abb0c@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:11:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9aa67689-aeba-4b28-86c2-04bd03e8941b@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0p7zcxMBeE5eRdYmg3UEnNd+bgT+vkob/tFU8mgZJS70eQiRF2N shrQ60tDhK4G9+ALY80LC+poPvJwbCfJB65yAcmJ1t/n2NB2w+bhovtNhvO2FlAyIMBOazX AOYGeR6spiDHp73vcYxifeQEp2Pc4Vm4p2G8fW+MeWdJtHaIGOhnGvv6/R/uXmd/BbvsiFt QHSgseH99jFa8vwy4iFcA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:jF2696YcVuo=:tZjGgg6M1XXhi5WgXGyt1r D3ENjPuRojHrYV8NOMLhBsIvlvFMiX4gDIqWGEEfbGcKLm3zg9TOI2u1aDSti5QHCUTX0NnQh AyJhXbfFcPIb2oiwEb+QdPe2VnYVehtDPivoh9AOVK3Bn/Ua4RSfB5Wd5nzwsxSmfGDtYRp9r SEd+mGlgulW5BkUkeFlS2T/gxdlMcH0kvicaZZWc6rog/QMryTrQeCDEVijJ2l/11ZbKkrMjd COK0lTW4ehDYxhw4RMupj2CE+wvHA+bhOLoH2pXAi3QYsdz5+vVb76Ig81pJr9iXYGd9/pJpe TOWcK+GDftiz0qZVDYuGjIR99MV1yj8BuNTmT3JkFl3s5VdnM7w9A2FVL8OQjOhXfk1WcoJLQ sluT9n7ZgwLkMhdMlid8DcL9NJ+cJYgYJG0WFjcVkjkstVIngXOF69C5AATrTezKB6kstt6jx NLswRfiNEpa9q0fq9JCpruxunIKzPHqeeTzWhwLgBg4W3Sw8XkUkpPPxmJUk4c7q+N2TlsPtN GJ+nuJpBDpArK3ONIYCdP0kCtQFiX3dLfngcQzlcsaxONi6dxO4ZWMNlc6VA07H2uHm4e6rFj bLboKlJGW22gtVrRowrRgS4gC6HSPkCpIKGKfC8fJ3reOFJ5asm5f4zVfzdxAnoRbXCmTFUtu WsoqCWR1GsQ2yigKrJeKSN3pDyz+jmeidsH4ZU33LZZkBTJLA631sKvh9kcckXnHYZeOBJqtZ 3Lz4nnCBTgzNyMxPn8mrjBkNLSFYQK1heEYNcUaHxOaehNYlSu7YQDSWO3pLFFr68jjqzcuZ+ ASUfo/a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/e8-5VrMmvQ4qXiuRLEhzGavmQOA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:28:57 -0000

On 2016-07-18 16:45, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> On 2016-07-18 16:11, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I believe this document needs an Appendix (next to Appendix A) which
>> summarizes what's actually different from RFC 7159.
>
> This gives a whole new meaning to the word "normative"...
>
> Anders

Looking at 
<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-00.txt>, 
the information is actually there (in Section 1.3). But it is still 
weird that we have an appendix for one but not the other.

To clarify, I'm looking specifically at the change in 
<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-00.txt#part-4> 
(yeah for anchors in the HTML diff!).

Best regards, Julian