IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] On representing what ECMA wants

Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD6F21E8082 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fft9QFohqrD4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com (mail-vc0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3183411E8131 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hf12so3488496vcb.1 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+GW+FWylczZrNvi+q/XrrzSeSE0fc1AJ56jkJDfnrss=; b=JxHxhbjj+ZeMTt5ui06iJ5TEx5ZutfY/wsTiQFAIthjmoC14qgVaTbplVhNBi20KfQ HMa/8rExNayC8vsIYTVUxUg0JhcG4ZEIVso3oN/Qo57NbFOzygGt8RuhJ7CKL+Hh3mjm EpN3xQoZBJfU9MR8fqpKZfhpBLXfEptiOUVsPE2N8lzopCcnpyj+UwLiIETVksF7jK/2 D4Ur6vmbShJkAYJrhNTFuK8VBQk/fuECooZhToWyGUFCZrCPekduP9GNKRng5nLjfHcy 13QQcZz7Wudipwd3G7rDP5AygqtSKaFCUK6cohOo5toRhKWmTAGjURb7S/W1pjHp8MOP zR3A==
X-Received: by 10.220.73.135 with SMTP id q7mr30918vcj.33.1371612194315; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.137.140 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C9893DB6-027A-409C-92F2-A267FFE64BAA@vpnc.org>
References: <51B9EA49.2050604@crockford.com> <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411528A0E2@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <51C1121E.8050004@crockford.com> <C9893DB6-027A-409C-92F2-A267FFE64BAA@vpnc.org>
From: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:22:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHfnhfqyVL3n03y=UPa98MaFXjA4tLwFF9VLesaRL_7KNdg=4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2917c9cabb504df79594f"
Cc: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] On representing what ECMA wants
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:23:23 -0000

cc es-discuss


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>wrote:

> <two chair hats on>
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this is the standard that ECMA wants to publish.
>
> As you know from our earlier off-list discussions, you do not represent
> ECMA, nor even TC39, to the IETF, nor even to this WG. Everyone from TC39
> represents themselves here. Your statement above still implies authority
> that doesn't exist.
>
> ECMA and TC39 leadership has had, and probably will continue to have,
> discussions about whether ECMA wants to have an official position on what
> they want to see from the IETF. Until we hear that from those higher-ups,
> no one speaks for ECMA here (and no one speaks for the IETF in TC39).
> Please try harder to refrain from suggesting that particular technical or
> process decisions would be what ECMA wants. Thanks in advance.
>
> --Matt and Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email