Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436C11A0385;
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.108
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
 autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id rvGUYOLdmxYz; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM
 [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CAEC1A0A8C;
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com
 [50.1.51.60]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s6AFgSnA052290
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:42:30 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host
 50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60] claimed to be
 [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4e1c044bf224420f94d1ebfb584f40ff@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:42:27 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B8DAF84-E799-46A5-BC55-5BF34000A548@vpnc.org>
References: <13c1732c5d504e84b80cd82e5e8f05ab@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <DE7ECD34-F035-46CC-B0B0-571039A86F3F@vpnc.org>
 <20140708190635.GD6016@mercury.ccil.org>
 <4CB92BF6-A5A0-4598-A25F-C3F51E1DFFD5@tzi.org>
 <7E9AAC20-63CC-48EC-81EE-3F53CB3DEF83@vpnc.org>
 <4e1c044bf224420f94d1ebfb584f40ff@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/eKdclNoNX-cbdFNd0UaQyrvpscc
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>,
 "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] merge-patch in APPSA and i-json in JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>,
 <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>,
 <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:42:39 -0000

On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:

>> The MergePatch operation is defined at the level of the JSON data
>> model.
>=20
> This seems reasonable, but where do I find the "JSON data model"
> described? I've looked in all of the JSON publications, RFCs,=20
> internet drafts, ECMA 262, 404.

RFC 7159. Might you instead suggest better wording for what you think we =
should say about what the MergePatch operation works on?

--Paul Hoffman=