[Json] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-json-00-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)





----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I wonder if we know how the mechanics of joint publication with 
ECMA will work out. I think everyone regretted doing that with W3C 
for xmldsig even though there was good will on all sides afaik, and 
that it'd be better if the WG just published the RFC having checked 
with ECMA at WGLC  and IETF LC. Note - I don't object to the 
idea of joint publication, I'm just wary that it might turn into a 
swamp of conflicting rules about copyright, IPR and when stuff 
happens in each process that could add significant delay and 
uncertainty and might give any folks in the rough far too much 
opportunity for fun. 

A possibly stupid idea if you do want to stick with joint publication: 
Add something to the milestones which causes a joint publication 
of <I don't care what> early on to debug the joint publication thing. 
Feel free to entirely ignore that though.