Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 01 March 2013 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5821F8EEC for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:58:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvshNWBp16Et for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7121F8EBB for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fs12so3036673lab.25 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:58:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=17TSwf2IxOSKID8GTvI6TJ98gBwvJVNy2v0iTr7bM4g=; b=VfW9VDVzxlDgOzlXYZLKvLqSY7nLbwyMraDNoXbPUyGWLseycs8ITVGQ9GHjpWfTOd 4XlxbV+0rbgcRUA7sG62MJo8TjyvheEGURYxOea40IiAbeGYcRm2EXekl/v9NA0RP4FT jjysCFST+QLGVOiMpgP19WAKCnYrPrz/cISXQfr6bNjTIIkGlqsaQWwMMo0kpvvlLA++ l2B8QCymIQ9hCLslb5uhSSOgsHJJ+EMF1JHXp4NKX32snr3GYY0LecEK6Oeq1LrfIYH0 txECnx7B0+am1ATX3kJWDYixBQ/dwm5o4/eLXXoySX5hMqUtHv8fFneDK2cgHfWkAYFK qavg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.83.133 with SMTP id q5mr957058lby.25.1362153482814; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.76.98 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:58:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8CD7BE2E-6824-4421-A021-BB3BBBA056D5@vpnc.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228170825.09fcfa20@elandnews.com> <CAC4RtVCWPp1LA_NCqdzpRetPbsoZ=fBb0APWr8=MoJqe8RxkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <8CD7BE2E-6824-4421-A021-BB3BBBA056D5@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:58:02 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 51GdKKX8jBv813zvIO5kKThX4Ok
Message-ID: <CALaySJJjsHZn5=_WgYwSOR-urHEiwXqYZ0i6shEuTNMn=TNWSw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:58:04 -0000

>>> I suggest against having an initial list.  It's difficult to predict whether
>>> people will have the energy to review once the charter has been approved.
>>
>> Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one item: make
>> 4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to add any other
>> items, which would be listed as individual work items in any recharter
>> proposal?
>
> That seems reasonable, given how excited people get about the "any other
> work items" and how that excitement could delay or derail the main reason
> you wanted the WG. The recharter effort can start after 4627bis document
> is in IETF Last Call. It's not like we're in any new rush for particular work.

I've edited the charter proposal on the appsawg wiki:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON

Barry