Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

>>> I suggest against having an initial list.  It's difficult to predict whether
>>> people will have the energy to review once the charter has been approved.
>>
>> Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one item: make
>> 4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to add any other
>> items, which would be listed as individual work items in any recharter
>> proposal?
>
> That seems reasonable, given how excited people get about the "any other
> work items" and how that excitement could delay or derail the main reason
> you wanted the WG. The recharter effort can start after 4627bis document
> is in IETF Last Call. It's not like we're in any new rush for particular work.

I've edited the charter proposal on the appsawg wiki:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON

Barry