[Json] bug in errata list for draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 08 March 2017 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ABB129634 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:29:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZqTk35SRn6S for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90565129632 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.100.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZiQy-1c03jy2q3o-00lU1M; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:29:06 +0100
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <4ae54d3f-1ac4-6d44-8049-c4e82d681fba@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:29:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6kF1YwPjggQotoPmSbKomhF/hpd5Qi4uYbVzHSGCnUuTF9R6F1v aSz3Yvl3pnHh9rMyksylaaQkyHsYSiV5BCalqUEBpXLQibAz/UgnK5XQUUKcJJWuGtFijPq OtHzA0KjhOa8FELO1JeaY8bGiaEx+W1TBSrMh47T1KQfSI3A5qAlFcfKBmE6voEEtYffXM4 hpsTkkAIF/zJKvTnJ3ZKA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:1FxcFkDLedM=:VMavGTWC2kjKntmcaU1inY sZ43aXs0iLc7fm6361vvh3j7jBkZr68pjSRo7AMEHJWh1RSTtFjZJpkuYtUbbUcapgz9ET+MG XZsygLJmVkRIxDTvexagOBi3Sk0zHacgfF/AROazJiACJC/UFYvgM6aKKOjYHHM9yEWgQ0VLg F3fzNfj/9vyZHiSuqeIdTq0eE5dPciLdk1LfUUoYhDUIg2k3vwKDxDivobVNcz9E6uB1smHtR qxfB+PNCT72eVNHhzkvtyh6vImLIK+AJRr9fP/TF0P83uZsaIyR4Wyz+77wdAw0KFlmtANgP7 34iOP1tVQD04xTb4JXoa7RzxQD0h0mYevwnjnjbaKeVUxVXLwdSFrDIZRTZFQ6/XDlUG4XAfH 9hhx2/5CWcI/p3FjgFtdCuQW6QU+BTQRxM54T6DkcjoILq8+LAQevisDNnEw1QLHuSnKXSGht ZoDlIb4xK3nVQl8hRY4nWkfRzb0fKqoLui+SC2so4wefHGRH+8amBWl4XwozXTWC39Pc7d6/+ 7ZuiVLWE5M++/O0x8esEBnaJYP4qyNmBiS52145pF8RcBZGoJrF+rBoeD8tfmFwIzXJ1lADTi +3mi/8R/hYpiSZabzqhUDWxhk3VzNH4UJKmURpwypQ2uaiI1HL/HVSgOb/k4vh4tDDfBtYlHR KuIjM4PhxLCHfYNjewESA6OXYhw/XChm2cD47tmlDZ9e9iTVO3c49cUet9V3WlqLikHdkT7m7 ULBbUT+5zeMsY3uW7NzHLRyxxG0Ch4yEr3VDEsswpjgpU9LDNScY0oKwzkIejUSUvW4Mz8SgQ 2TcTfUS
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/fusYZoei7dSyqiWfX5H2FaLD6f8>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [Json] bug in errata list for draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:29:11 -0000

<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03#section-15.2>:

>    [Err3607]  RFC Errata, "Errata ID 3607", RFC 4627,
>               <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>    [Err3915]  RFC Errata, "Errata ID 7159", RFC 7159,
>               <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>    [Err4264]  RFC Errata, "Errata ID 7159", RFC 7159,
>               <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>    [Err4336]  RFC Errata, "Errata ID 7159", RFC 7159,
>               <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>    [Err607]   RFC Errata, "Errata ID 607", RFC 4627,
>               <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.


The newly added ones have an incorrect title.

That said: I realize that this way to cite an erratum is the one 
accepted by the RSE - other than that, it's brain dead, in that:

a) it provides minimal help to actually get to the erratum (requires 
following a link, opening a form, entering values), and

b) is semantically incorrect, as the erratum of an RFC is not the same 
thing as the RFC (but that's what the seriesInfo information is claiming).

Best regards, Julian

(cc'ing rfc-interest)