Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0268612DFCA; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_xZNFkdHSth; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D3912DFD5; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u186so68627614ita.0; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IBOyMrBlBAe1yFZGn4EHpH9RsHeg5rDd4GXN8iSoRbc=; b=Wjy4EBXP92JW9GhzoEI26foRiu2ke3Vs+Gk8sQXuOOkAtKrgMyy3erFf1xaQ8wEj4d Lt4MnXaVt6EXFwatndjIqga+CaVnX0zmF9dER1ldBG/s97vWShBmz4I7IYCIbTM+HUJU u54tf26yCSAzsyaZUKD0U+X8G1sEPZv4JCtUHM3Km1k3M7Nwq9GSEkMgdyBKis+HvLPA AEXuCCGO461gMsvlYKtthKiN28TPjxZIUTHAs5OBsG/wcPRDts7Kxtoe77Qt34GePyph 2s0WFHo5PgOG5ixcdeh5ON9sNmiOMbr0m0yHcvbvxCUYlalwCiKOQopAErbojDS72OjG 4vEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IBOyMrBlBAe1yFZGn4EHpH9RsHeg5rDd4GXN8iSoRbc=; b=RSZuRc+k5NGol+FYAuLaBlskoBQGOxJuAOyYwEdVIkcFRWhuAyk0oGGIoj9m7fhmz+ AM3t76+0ZxbfPJhGavCQuOigN99yPoWKc18/DHlAa7w0hbM7kakIO2agflctPyLZW1Jo xISk94AIdz5q2W0NDP5MFCZoQ9R5S0zegGbBBqBmJI0cIvICHkQJb3cnjB6WyIywxjcR oxfPOFlGZPcIMRkWyevUbu0P8pSBFeWWXt2DttjpTcNlQ6XUl6Oce+sGBvx5M+0MOcgB NXD7i+ggC0Nw5VXWeOyhzyW8Ofpg4Zv8mMxuBWCSaqvfyz63gfHOUNKEG+NDFoLltm38 YSbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJOXEgdSCgavafTaiOsOEsNwrg15a01PQCC3EYUtL/A6qkwlO1BtZF+CwcspVHo6Q==
X-Received: by 10.36.103.4 with SMTP id u4mr48523712itc.88.1468850093673; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from idefix.nuance.com ([199.4.160.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm1325255itg.17.2016.07.18.06.54.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com>
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1e137fbf-6d67-d9b4-acbf-b53291c7bd40@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:54:50 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/iFzzp0qrxPzEUJVuExCSDYb3cM8>
Cc: "draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:29:17 -0000

My understanding is that ECMA 404 is about to undergo a change, and this
change is important to the changes in rfc7159bis.  If this is the case, then I
believe that rfc7159bis should not have gone to last call, as one of the
document's normative references is in flux and there is no pointer in the
document to even a draft of the new version of the normative document.

Ideally rfc7159bis should not go to last call until there is the equivalent of
a last call version of the revised ECMA 404.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications



On 07/18/2016 05:58 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> This starts the Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02, ending on July 31.
> 
> Please send all comments to this list (json@ietf.org) or the draft author/editor (draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org).  Any and all comments are welcome, including simple statements that this document is ready to progress.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> - JSONbis Chair
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>