Re: [Json] JSL: Clarifying purpose, and renaming it to JDDF

Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com> Sun, 01 September 2019 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ulysse@segment.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CE71200DF for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=segment.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUKY2RU7j3w3 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460C712008F for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 15:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id j4so25502561iog.11 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 15:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=segment.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Fry7kUhQbI7BRkrdlLCTrn4FfGTbdzAdFftFvn9UrYE=; b=bVkQP8ztvu9B2vCV89EFwlCnKf5O3SHCdwZToZJ4q66uRb2zW+vLN1EnlsELwk08rn OznE7MF0BDNWKpiCWwZcwHoQtu4vhpICmNp9eKmpDDqkXDqUTs6ifD7Nf2Aw2PBkM+kV eV8N53Ktc6IRouhb220KEPeCqqzf6hIK+BiAo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Fry7kUhQbI7BRkrdlLCTrn4FfGTbdzAdFftFvn9UrYE=; b=dzFLWrRwetwU3HCoUEKyQfsuSDSZZ4O94nKRGRHP6x1sw09Fp91YtdFn1EgRdSOYRg q8EX8RBn/gPMGuzNdLTbRFNnzWflFgJ2UluIXh8t8BQSja6NiPKOUUcqZj7bcZpASryf 69LwVV+P5+JRsnDyXFPZ8+b6BLvRSFNZca6bOah7wSCj7ZYbRZMppagn1lyaF2Jte8jV PX2rO6HDaTDYltsJe+kVUBF7x3jtu/Iu+KM54pxzw//pMWjBl/TC0PGj7WPjFumTezKm geFpbrYyPXZlWTPEHcg8eqVjG/3ZC7sgs9A4bV1forMk0VAaCWP5vcv9EEHkC+UnXU+/ gKgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdF6CZzSIQE/NKYsLbljtrK3PkyoqNEweZbGnkLGyNhl7Docua W6oApvmmVVXz/hTHq24xX/SPDBS+WUQx3EZl2VY9z9rUAhQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEz8JLuDs7wXqC1Kr6k39OLNvhyB+BochtnFSh3F4YTx4CI1SZWwizbWuZ/C7aCQT9hXvf9CGla3KbfDzwWcM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c652:: with SMTP id k18mr21712063jan.44.1567376888395; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 15:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJK=1Rj6zW_MffKvsOiQh28KY5yDeoALGSYqve+vGj52s1Owag@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2gp_Qw2=J8vuimyVAta=cZEos9qmzLd-RsK3czkM5LvFSi7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2gp_Qw2=J8vuimyVAta=cZEos9qmzLd-RsK3czkM5LvFSi7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 15:27:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJK=1Rh927YqLgqhewT+EOEjtbpFsVvUnE=9cr+ng0+CY-7rSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/jg0JzHMXiihWCidUPzh9o9BNLqU>
Subject: Re: [Json] JSL: Clarifying purpose, and renaming it to JDDF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 22:28:11 -0000

Fixed-length strings and arrays both sound like things one could
implement with extensions, no?

Tuples are a very sensible suggestion. But I wonder if we can live
without them? I very much want to keep JDDF as small as possible.