IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Mon, 18 July 2016 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229F12DCDB for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=WN96RQ+H; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dqNp/Anu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FtwMQAtwKAZ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE1812DEAA for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18407209DE for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:48:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=BmadZEqa5EAXCf+vCaCdPN13vWE=; b=WN96RQ +HKTM4u/C90bJBpiS6Nla9KLtIPs0VCYrTxM+8tMMiJJ3NGoLMLmTI/8Sn8qjdwl fKAebrRbiKRH1C7u5cq4KNSDQVNWhl7bPH2Civwiq5BiQqE3YAXOy1d4KmgStEBd 4Rl913SpF92qW+TrobiyX9bGe5v5HAu/+Q6tI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=BmadZEqa5EAXCf+ vCaCdPN13vWE=; b=dqNp/AnuJ36Vyb2E5zE9MBBeHzleRQQ8zY9zHTLll7fiE8b v1AeEcVoADPTnovn/tI6PtgHueN69nezkO1gy1yVf2901anPgavf/3DzcIu8FFZF g+wwAYpDo2ISI8Uk9Dq3Zkhcug6yXfGVObeY+ie0jot0iocEmc3C2wKXpMDo=
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id C9455D01C3; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:48:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1468853282.937413.669539185.65D8F56E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: KDS1mp665rBL8RYfOoTsQeHMJY74yjiz/NiY1cm2UUfh 1468853282
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: json@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6fae4dd4
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:48:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <876b2dda-340c-c0e6-6323-a736a1e8e504@gmx.de>
References: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com> <876b2dda-340c-c0e6-6323-a736a1e8e504@gmx.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/jub4GDHUnXUF3nkP0WM3XnbhPaM>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:13:02 -0000

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:11 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I believe this document needs an Appendix (next to Appendix A) which 
> summarizes what's actually different from RFC 7159.

Correct, this is an IETF requirement on all -bis documents.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email