Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38264129B83; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1MSW7zlvyIx; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D36B12986C; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99E7A004B16; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpe-70-123-158-140.austin.res.rr.com [70.123.158.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F727A004B13; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:15:06 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20170313221505.GG543@localhost>
References: <1fb5849e-8dbf-835d-65b7-2403686248f9@outer-planes.net> <b3cb2651-2d9f-d68d-2191-814e8dd5f5e2@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b3cb2651-2d9f-d68d-2191-814e8dd5f5e2@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/k7cdYCiEawDFPWzCCSzhm4wvVcw>
Cc: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:15:19 -0000

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:50:42PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> I personally would prefer the table that I posted, as directly identifies
> byte ordering as well:
> 
> >           00 00 00 xx  UTF-32BE
> >           00 xx 00 xx  UTF-16BE
> >           xx 00 00 00  UTF-32LE
> >           xx 00 xx 00  UTF-16LE
> >           xx xx xx xx  UTF-8

WFM.