Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level
"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3F821F96F2 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zZlaWaw-Q3A for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8BC21F95EF for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1473; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370623423; x=1371833023; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bouo8B2mdbE4Jp2vfy1zkLcSfLZTwG+IuapTv5o3cHo=; b=gqqpU6niZehEqAcYcGSqz1bYJQ76SiVRWYDA4F81/pnTupUSZ0+IxKim DUmGSVBmn2fuO4jB7dGk1kBOc8sLsQUUs18StQ7RHnZlWdJSJJxfZo7hL 8QWs+vWQtXpQnMpzqxW0sttM6AMNI5m3zSS+fQiGNOoLqeaBh6tEuU/uN E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFALUMslGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgwkwvm+BABZ0giUBBAEBAWsdAQgiSwslAQEEARIIh3MDDwy0HR2IQo8HOIJ7YQOpAoMPgic
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,823,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="220126064"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2013 16:43:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r57Ghggc021773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:43:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.56]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:43:42 -0500
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level
Thread-Index: Ac5jMj7wK5i9s5prS+2npykXIGILbgAY4nWA
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:43:42 +0000
Message-ID: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70FC3397C@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1151B21F9A9@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-ID: <FC7F2E680FB60E479EC7C3ECC200E830@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:43:51 -0000
I like this change, but it has impact on section three. These JSON docs: 0 "" "?" means that the table should probably look like: 00 00 00 xx UTF-32BE 00 xx ?? xx UTF-16BE xx 00 00 00 UTF-32LE xx 00 xx ?? UTF-16LE xx xx ?? ?? UTF-8 algorithmically: if length<2 return UTF-8 if buf[0] if buf[1] return UTF-8 if length<4 or buf[2] return UTF-16LE return UTF-32LE if buf[1] return UTF-16BE return UTF-32BE On 6/6/13 9:51 PM, "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote: >The current spec only allows a JSON text to be an object or array. >Section 2. "JSON Grammar" says: > > A JSON text is a serialized object or array. > > JSON-text = object / array > > >I propose allowing a JSON text to be any JSON value. > > A JSON text is a serialization of any JSON value. > > JSON-text = value > > value = false / null / true / object / array / number / string > > >ECMAScript already allows this. >http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.12 > > * The top level JSONText production of the ECMAScript JSON grammar > may consist of any JSONValue rather than being restricted to being > a JSONObject or a JSONArray as specified by RFC 4627. > >-- >James Manger > > >_______________________________________________ >json mailing list >json@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json > -- Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level … Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level … Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Stephan Beal
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Vinny A
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Matt Miller (mamille2)
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jorge
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jorge
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jorge
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Jorge
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level R S
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Allow any JSON value at the top level Martin J. Dürst