Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 01 March 2013 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44BF21F9154 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:02:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRQT397DDEdq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F2B21F913D for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:02:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.129.24.65] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 945964060C; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:10:50 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <5130D12C.2000004@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:02:52 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228170825.09fcfa20@elandnews.com> <CAC4RtVCWPp1LA_NCqdzpRetPbsoZ=fBb0APWr8=MoJqe8RxkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <8CD7BE2E-6824-4421-A021-BB3BBBA056D5@vpnc.org> <CALaySJJjsHZn5=_WgYwSOR-urHEiwXqYZ0i6shEuTNMn=TNWSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJjsHZn5=_WgYwSOR-urHEiwXqYZ0i6shEuTNMn=TNWSw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:02:54 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/1/13 8:58 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>>> I suggest against having an initial list.  It's difficult to
>>>> predict whether people will have the energy to review once
>>>> the charter has been approved.
>>> 
>>> Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one
>>> item: make 4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to
>>> add any other items, which would be listed as individual work
>>> items in any recharter proposal?
>> 
>> That seems reasonable, given how excited people get about the
>> "any other work items" and how that excitement could delay or
>> derail the main reason you wanted the WG. The recharter effort
>> can start after 4627bis document is in IETF Last Call. It's not
>> like we're in any new rush for particular work.
> 
> I've edited the charter proposal on the appsawg wiki: 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON

+1 modulo a few typos here and there. Mind if I fix them on the wiki page?

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRMNErAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pHA4P/3D1PAdDIyUP9QRHspG8HvUw
uUSsnp8abxKgT9XbfVnKdZKxxjrqLet6Lq5fr/myYwslLQLT4dBxbevqYIxOMlvr
RczUAuRpoUOcOJ4+vNZgf91cjZRO8bbY7GOusegPcHYTvgOPK7xJeQpoCoo/jFBN
5kH1SlOFugn1yOECIdwUZnfG97eW6dBd3/gGH2Qq/7aluW6/rwc24bTUsn/1ABdm
WH8gf5djr2Ak7KNUHVpyAL1AQgIPK+ebZFwPVRxzA216/y9qam+K72VegOzz/Dm9
Zb8H3Gdu0xBsjgcNBWs9DF1xUzZ1sQxyKNpzjWfzBWx4FdyCI/VVc29Xeh/G/S4s
bcBCjFf30rIX/uVaCJcLll4FeMioZT+8hKqBNeVjVoEyJZIRKWu7VuIijPIOlyYX
G6IMYaYsyavNahJWOEGmax1KzKZbxvUqj93CeLwOXbMvCIKuuXiita6/B+01wPtp
4kfsAWlVDAthHCaN9TZEn/vLIWJVnXx1G7lfYkRqmFwv7MxYfeu+JXYA0Cx+KECI
9XONIv9wg9GuEJBJb44Ua5bIdCazS7y/Fd0OtXG4azVm+QvyUDyQWJo0TPaldO4e
P1ii6W/VLP3PW2kh23uHH67K31Rig1k6scJ5qlzZ/0c55jE77OfVKp5xCSVM07K9
bt7+ZKgj0zWVTpQCClc7
=BHP4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----