Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/1/13 8:58 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>>> I suggest against having an initial list.  It's difficult to
>>>> predict whether people will have the energy to review once
>>>> the charter has been approved.
>>> 
>>> Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one
>>> item: make 4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to
>>> add any other items, which would be listed as individual work
>>> items in any recharter proposal?
>> 
>> That seems reasonable, given how excited people get about the
>> "any other work items" and how that excitement could delay or
>> derail the main reason you wanted the WG. The recharter effort
>> can start after 4627bis document is in IETF Last Call. It's not
>> like we're in any new rush for particular work.
> 
> I've edited the charter proposal on the appsawg wiki: 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON

+1 modulo a few typos here and there. Mind if I fix them on the wiki page?

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=BHP4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----