IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 18 March 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102011A03BC for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mA-rqh8ncWXs for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AE81A037C for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s2IFUGR1079142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:30:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <532864FC.8040700@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:30:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE6D04D1-C063-41E6-A635-3AD8127B6F28@vpnc.org>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de> <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org> <532864FC.8040700@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/lxiJ7kanDV_7e3wE-YXk5NDeRwk
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:30:32 -0000

On Mar 18, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2014-03-18 16:14, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2014-03-17 23:17, Matt Miller wrote:
>>>> Greetings again.  We earlier asked a couple of questions to gauge what
>>>> the new proposed WG charter ought to contain.  That feedback has been
>>>> valuable, but has drilled into implementation specifics before a new
>>>> charter was actually agreed on!  We have been chastised by our AD about
>>>> this, and for good reason.  We think we already have enough input from
>>>> the London meeting and the list over the past few days to make the
>>>> following proposal for a new charter:
>>>> ...
>>> 
>>> What happened to the proposal to add James Snell's json-merge draft to the list of WG items?
>> 
>> I don't remember that discussion. draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch should still be part of AppsAWG; it just needs someone to take over the work.
>> 
>> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> We talked about that after the WG meeting, didn't we?

Errrr, maybe? Your recollection may be better than mine.

Having said that, I'm not sure if this draft needs to move from AppsAWG: it just needs an author to finish the draft.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email