IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Tue, 07 May 2019 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85F61200EB for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 14:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9wWZJUK6ETij for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postoffice.gristmillmedia.com (dret.net [209.188.86.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79997120291 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 108-67-65-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.67.65.66]:56957 helo=[192.168.1.78]) by postoffice.gristmillmedia.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1hO84L-0000PT-4A; Tue, 07 May 2019 17:56:13 -0400
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>
Cc: Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
References: <CAJK=1RjV1uv0eOdtFZ8cKn-FfCwCiGP5r2hOz1UamiM6YV4H1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itE8kub1qtdRoW8BqxaOmzMv=vUo1aDeuAr3HX141NUGg@mail.gmail.com> <77994bdb-a400-be90-5893-b846a8e13899@gmail.com> <20190507154201.GP21049@localhost> <CEF72901-5077-4305-BA68-60624DCE952D@bzfx.net> <69ea0c99-e983-5972-c0aa-824ddeecb7c4@dret.net> <CAMm+LwjyVjnJuWE4+a9Ea=_X1uuEGuK+O4KojzN3uVQ+s+HqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <058f58a3-dd27-998e-5f54-4874aff5f2f0@dret.net>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 14:56:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjyVjnJuWE4+a9Ea=_X1uuEGuK+O4KojzN3uVQ+s+HqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - postoffice.gristmillmedia.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dret.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: authenticated_id: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/mnpX0ID2R0lDEkwKtUgkbYJga_o>
Subject: Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 21:56:20 -0000

On 2019-05-07 14:48, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>     at the risk of referring to XSD too much, but i think they got it right:
> 
>     - constraining facets for constraining the value space.
>     - lexical facets for constraining the representation of values.
> 
> I disagree on the constraining facets part. The only values I have found 
> useful to put in a schema are 0 or 1 minimum occurrences and 1 or 
> infinity maximum occurrences.

there may be a misunderstanding here. constraining facets are limiting 
the value space of datatypes, for example by defining minimum and 
maximum values.

https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#rf-facets

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email