IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] BOMs

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Fri, 22 November 2013 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D3D1ADF89; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:29:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUwFh5gHpsTk; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F01ADBE5; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:29:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1315; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385144958; x=1386354558; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=9zPsJQ9pbdu50TgB6oTA16kE2XNtnFY9iuCr9S46USo=; b=SfpWCZntmlmIo7rh3L2wdZpEISnBdLLn79kUDDc0HJS+XsPqAL0Llj+F YO4XNRFglcB14h6e0/MXBLzMcaxdjtx1a5TqAtSDuEW3x7+AedA+pa271 w9IUUnp+/G3yq4B4vsEpsl2EVOjbYPpVLUpUYvAI1CzVZNDpRQkQEJRuy M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioFAD+ij1KtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7wVgSIWdIImAQEEeRACAQhGMiUCBAENE4dzwScXjwcHgyCBEgOQMYExgk+DY5ISgyiCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,753,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="286933319"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2013 18:29:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAMIT2dV007955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:29:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.19]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:29:02 -0600
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Json] BOMs
Thread-Index: AQHO5VjqYoK0+ygbbEegiH/v100NRpouCp6AgAGLPgCAAH85gIAAO1GAgAALNQCAAZ+1AA==
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:29:01 +0000
Message-ID: <11233CA7-B075-483D-A1C3-3BF6CF91AEE3@cisco.com>
References: <f5bk3g6ufqy.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk> <5289F974.9020709@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <020401cee50f$a2cdf5c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <528B46EA.4040503@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <43255615-2FC9-4726-99FD-1B13D6B1F033@wirfs-brock.com> <f5br4ackyqm.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk> <528C5445.3050600@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <A20405C4-F7AA-4141-AE19-222708A096F7@wirfs-brock.com> <CANXqsR+KwYJyZgCLB+b7P6O3=EgY3io-XwvuBLsfWOQ8zbp8Ww@mail.gmail.com> <50CFBDEE-53A5-4159-93C4-348CF31EC8EF@wirfs-brock.com> <qkfs89lqbec1g7qog6no9ukd23jpslparp@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <qkfs89lqbec1g7qog6no9ukd23jpslparp@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.44]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F7B57A2D-EBBE-4841-BC75-843E01A14660"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] BOMs
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:29:26 -0000

There does not appear to be any consensus on explicitly allowing or disallowing of a Byte Order Mark (BOM).  Neither RFC4627 nor the current draft mention BOM anywhere, and the modus operandi of the JSON Working Group has been to leave text unchanged unless there was wide support.


- Paul Hoffman and Matt Miller

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email