Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631D31A00FA for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BikME_3t5aa for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76E51A00F4 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so15773459iol.3 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Nj+b5d6KuP2Eqan01nrmCl1u7SCPqRtuocXtVOTTwZQ=; b=ASRVKHQJGMvZEKWC6YUnVaav0iQ6ImZFSFa+EaXFKkxJM7v6RJp0o8hTN8VCypy+83 iMZaGtlOqC9e87zth2Wbk7RW+1G2XWtF3N268wBJ5dvQQrvOd2NXgzli2EsyOH/jrfXl CZZA4WkK3sDJlS7XRmBE9tgT/njNE7SSIwWzT1eFCr9A3r7oHhmKMxR+DWhFffy+Xt0C xwHOLK5FaG0m2gIsckIxNKiyhewxUQvLfx5D7YQoeX61zfCAAYBZQEvR7HXxLTIXpF0Y mNiAgvjL4bcaJdAI0oi4hBXsk2PGyMoAWfv+XxcWIbl5SBADjfhuB1BktFrC5Q+gxE22 Tr7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnI+7+3+rghZjdUCXMOHP+miEAxJOqaq9VfhO2OI9BE9B8nJg26AtsSwEQPJ3AzA1RORhtx
X-Received: by 10.107.163.204 with SMTP id m195mr28415115ioe.65.1445222982055; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.30.4 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.248.61]
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVD3cKThDTr_eS-QCUhKqZkMS0y+nPS5HxCk3f1RQ7VyJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DB74C466-D542-42D6-95B0-690A564435A9@cisco.com> <CAC4RtVD3cKThDTr_eS-QCUhKqZkMS0y+nPS5HxCk3f1RQ7VyJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:49:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6itk7trcj8A6rdXfUNDquLHwbjwi1-K1eRoJFog_uD59gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140fb70779ef705226c32f9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/nkLQ6i4A6qq4HHn4w_-EmyH4HW4>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 02:49:44 -0000

It’s not letting me submit the draft because it claims that:
============
JavaScript Object Notation
Group exists but is not an active group
============
I’ve uploaded the XML & txt & HTML to http://www.tbray.org/ietf/7159bis/ -
if someone else knows how to work around this go ahead, otherwise I could
upload it as an individual submission.


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:

> > In a nutshell, the goal of this effort is to produce a bis to 7159 that:
> >
> > * promotes JSON to IETF Internet Standard
> > * references ECMA-404 and is a reference for ECMA-404
> >
> > Tim Bray has agreed to edit 7159bis.
> >
> > As a start, I propose we start with rfc7159 and:
> >
> > 1) Apply verified errata from <
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7159 >
> > 2) Change the reference to ECMA-404 from informative to normative
>
> Can we get a first version of this before the I-D cutoff for Yoko
> (this coming Monday, 19 Oct)?
>
> Barry
>



-- 
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)