IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 05 October 2013 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B3221F9C46 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksNsWkmvBRpW for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C8721F9D9A for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l4so3356096qcv.10 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TMNWvX3/XwDGDt3f29GyNiflbHfwcC38/BMaxoOEj0Y=; b=wVq2kyNpadJ2MN2Xjj+ZjVkA99FYL0H/9kMsfu0qhACpynvMutlrryrYi4KJVcpTkQ X0Qb82yamb2Be2TtJeH0c1NJUcaqdgOQRq7aDaWqUtURKsFhw9qFnBWN77BXThYfQ5i0 CO4YOFfDGFQgECplSLaycq8Z+JoRvfQM1AbqGOJZnRDc7KqzKAygPo9u+CmaEdf7B37r lUYx/8RpXppkjOQr45/2txw7fzIXAI4p4CnyJ2uKry55ZiV+AX5yhkgL1qWwsxrIEj6m DFz68acnN78ydfWbReNE2YZEGEISAsNfZvLChYuqiKJL3wE4m49RI/d72B4aYLqHZlPI cPkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.103.161 with SMTP id fx1mr21601996qeb.68.1380935558686; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.86.147 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A67164C2-EC7C-46D7-A748-0D5591E0B4A6@vpnc.org>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF2B583@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <A67164C2-EC7C-46D7-A748-0D5591E0B4A6@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:12:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzxpA89dk+JqJbWPbWgdyofNSOFkJy9+U-0GNunZsbjcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e466a6eef1204e7f41d36"
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 01:12:43 -0000

Just to be clear, I think this means: the chairs feel there is no consensus
to change conformant top-level values in the new RFC, but there is
consensus to reference ES 5.1 for the purposes of pointing out that there
are differences.

Is that correct?

- Rob

On Friday, October 4, 2013, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> <hat on>
>
> There seems to be deep disagreement, with sound technical arguments on
> both sides. The chairs take this as "don't change the document".
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status