IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Sat, 15 March 2014 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406EF1A026E for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHXlYR0sZsZ1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1841A0230 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ma3so3404001pbc.27 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qn1jOn+o6fDOMX8LUXAsXqR5kDGReE+oQsA0X0r51Do=; b=DYnG9acIDCJAb5MyKJtW0yDOe0Pou7E0J5sn2Va9scDZQ09fdCj5Eue0c7BAER6DlN IAx/h+S1ZzaCVHTI0Wvaxb8sSraj4UjND3OzMFp39SI57SArQKkTF9g4FZ70b12S8TNg l3/P4sNNegxFbytNFqf2XQY9EDgF6nKFvDCbJiNEv6PdmKLbp1zI+Xj+S23zF9z3oL1V wS8ZinaX95pbLq67Wph9AmgTzlEeY9FoGD/mk72fp9XJ9SPUWdf+KDc36r2vB6t/VEv7 vGOMQSJwfrgPvedL8SqqjGz/BW9ZNyF2rC8FMHQfnnt8D1Seqx3AORQ7i0sK6e/qv3Kx L0ig==
X-Received: by 10.68.131.202 with SMTP id oo10mr12550742pbb.35.1394851413396; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.198.240] (pw126253067027.6.panda-world.ne.jp. [126.253.67.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yk4sm21091124pbc.16.2014.03.14.19.43.30 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-B1464D4A-C9DA-4F57-B254-C44E86CEAFE8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D167)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgFUS509fHg6Nn_gzfbntHznob6BKYdcQ+2eT3DsJpWsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:43:29 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C3FB43E9-E38C-4A80-A24C-73791CB6C036@gmail.com>
References: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com> <CAMm+LwgFUS509fHg6Nn_gzfbntHznob6BKYdcQ+2eT3DsJpWsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/oN1ZAykWpV1wtRJX7RZ_13RMdXY
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:43:42 -0000

+1 

=nat via iPhone

Mar 15, 2014 9:18、Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> のメッセージ:

> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:
>> The chairs are seeking comment on whether we should adopt I-JSON
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bray-i-json-01) as a WG item in our
>> charter. Remember that adopting this draft does not mean it is done;
>> changes can happen based on the consensus of the WG.
>> 
>> Note that the current draft does *not* have the new MIME type nor the
>> reserved field name that was heavily debated in London; that could be
>> added later if there is WG consensus to do so.
>> 
>> Please speak up whether or not you believe our charter should be amended
>> to include this work item.
> 
> +1
> 
>  
> -- 
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status