Re: [Json] WGLC nit
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 11 October 2013 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F160221F9C12 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PotPHhw7PBBw for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f42.google.com (mail-vb0-f42.google.com [209.85.212.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEB311E817C for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e12so3225704vbg.1 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xQcit4Uoc7f4HMFzwKolAuwAOP7ea7/WOH7DUl9Pasw=; b=N7P4I7fIZ6QpwDLuCDiqc5Nek65KLhdqeMTRhwpIUdSeE9uj9ckuMFyQuaylbDUPF7 7vTPZNS0t/KSys49voWeGg2BVwm5KhvFnIr9096aTXucKjX33aZKsv22EJEpT2WdJqfy PnREqBzqWQOh92E+Q8MaUcTMO0psReh804NpcuWomLnPCR95bpULxAUJliGOlFjrGf1K eoB50oyHnGpXsXcLbm0gBwu1suynQ+D0Bw2ynRCoqoPxeJExl+QYHqVvEAxgs6D1cMgA GhW6iPqNctdO5NM0Z+XNQ71yrO/G0yTCu8weqjvP9ya0IgXieDKBQkRLONj7NcP2uPIq LbjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHc4O6qpysNjDv2I67Inun2Nqt0CnGQCEcXyv08mFs+YO+bwftQL5THcDaeDMhS5TCTIWC
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.105.199 with SMTP id u7mr22113358vco.1.1381524754621; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.174.197 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOgyxJbyu3k4VBQU4X-vux-FM6uPi6qcBLekkwpmzjjL8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK3OfOgyxJbyu3k4VBQU4X-vux-FM6uPi6qcBLekkwpmzjjL8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:52:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iv6+mEVvjgC48ZBGpRBKmTWBCA7=kYd0AdOG6DNNKJ9Kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b343eca3f79f604e87d4cc5"
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] WGLC nit
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:53:01 -0000
Well, it’s consistent with the rule for “char”. I’m really reluctant to get into beautifying this stuff. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>wrote: > The ABNF rule for ws is not consistently indented. > _______________________________________________ > json mailing list > json@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json >
- [Json] WGLC nit Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] WGLC nit Tim Bray