IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Sat, 15 March 2014 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03071A0159 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yytBdIqZJejs for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF731A0165 for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1WOraw-0001Da-Qg; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:37:58 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:37:58 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Message-ID: <20140315163758.GC24343@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com> <nll8i999lis5u0f719iv6bgte71d8uus52@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <20140315143553.GC30147@mercury.ccil.org> <72u8i9dj6ih7o95cibq44o8kuq8k2dm40l@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAHBU6it+GfM7RR5q3Rr+Oj5PU4UnK7yW1LPsrXf6FxxoWDNfFQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6it+GfM7RR5q3Rr+Oj5PU4UnK7yW1LPsrXf6FxxoWDNfFQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/qqGMOFKjsKUS2ufC_-HCQh2VyT8
Cc: json@ietf.org, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:38:17 -0000

Tim Bray scripsit:

> > For human-readable documentation purposes it is entirely sufficient to
> > say "follows RFC XXXX conventions" and
> 
> What is XXXX?

The as yet unassigned number for the I-JSON RFC.  Bjoern is IIUC arguing
against a new MIME type specific to I-JSON.

-- 
If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper]              John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing.                       cowan@ccil.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email