IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title

Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C221E8127 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.298, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89F8pZMLQkIr for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE1F21E811B for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b12so6690980wgh.31 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=NzAaM+VX5H+yg+8BP1kMPlg5W+hhSjFWrVyQUz06rdo=; b=I7+x9o5xBWNNhCjZAh+cXgecbgLvIL8bY02whgWLqxCZSjapp0BrP7PiE/tD9bsAOK TtLWNRVjTDnhavapNxmHGjFBvJMsLkJ2YhCECZ3kxgi7kqP7Y3WVu0Ov1JtFTHU2cspo /wPJV2/tTxrma7kkeh/9bL9a6OUPlrru/PgBygX/RwhJr9Z+jAlx0ZKe5/buN0Tv051m PY7SgS8uP+syCiLMIQLydhzk2kdHGmmTOKGGUC9MV/lMzeswCI7J8ENCdx4+zhfI9LbU UlAWG7I3yD5I5K5XUA6+wszodkij+MYNaeoJMKe5II+xfZj25wOFZrVmv2pnl3pN/PjJ dczw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.75.201 with SMTP id e9mr9704042wjw.20.1371835411143; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.42.230 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
References: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:23:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKd4nAhFH0EQgDORR1eh497eFhu-aQr23h4iCJAFRcMm7Aprxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04efc5f224104dfad5299"
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:23:36 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> There are three proposals for dealing with the document title:
>

1, 2

0 is a real mouthful, and i thought the consensus was to distance JSON from
JS. (i'm ambivalent on that point, though.)

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email