Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04.txt
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 20 July 2017 10:50 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DB1129AD1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsUUvG-EoY3r for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4C1131BFA for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id m7so18252930qtm.4 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MJ8BK7+82GMq9kK7+3PIxEAhXhcPP7iYj1Ay/caYySU=; b=YjTo+g6dp1Mpj/0A05OtxMZhcQobbiU80Bcl+Bl8hHvqHu1Vq3aB89iinld/Ywy/zW XDg2WbKvwG1joF1Dk5X3x+QpSWdL4qIpgLmGvzUkrDVX16bfTCY9UYZAEY2BNPZxBo69 QnRIRJNy3dQ8QuLrKK9l5l56vXuop1SQE3Jf4M1dMhCPYPWP6VlKMOEsQ7f4zX8HJE9z OzQsPcR1SpfNONkGWb43X0xUzJU2iG4VAlZzNE3cpKEsc9q8ZHpTLYpWmDdzY4VZEd0V FSUy5GxIGfeHN57S2FKqQ0+SNyEma41uQ29ldC3hx3Scgq2xylErfFAe0a+EDImCJKA3 lT3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MJ8BK7+82GMq9kK7+3PIxEAhXhcPP7iYj1Ay/caYySU=; b=etRs+aZa/zXI/0LgXJ8FCIDaHIrx7A95Q06u4vOrQw4MRt5q9k81IKe4BqEv1l0FMB c0I28Bak0sDuYtXdIwUjefF/rHUXhfb8k3jXDCgQrWc8GyqOxvZ7LU+AyE2CYyBaAlOZ egNmZolivf2o1CCztHpVvF59EK5SHQgaAWL84JcHlBP+3QYwl3zfRqQSejmmCbX+axZw 321CZgFv1eCAguBLcRklZV5aYXvRDyBt4C+aHVv4Qgw92qcoJvqv3OQkX7jBZB3N0DCW iWt/07HggzbY60xPaUmcwFMygRcPQmFCkQA5cOxoaunv/2NtEMNLx9HApbAJv4IfBbkn F4+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110LctTWrUEnhNDPeYrjNbcN2wf9zYmqytYJho+yy/AxVxnbzZOF 3ealcwfC/stRlzRrVwqy4ZUm8ToEnQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.181 with SMTP id b50mr4097021qta.122.1500547818750; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.200.37.40 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DB9BA7EA-D393-4079-B347-620A09280B26@isode.com>
References: <150047191184.7507.7143481683564082881@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB9BA7EA-D393-4079-B347-620A09280B26@isode.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:50:18 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: XgE-dzscvb-fgNf1yuhBIZuUaM0
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBYMrRCrUZ1qqD+_rH4M8N23GOgbbh=921fEYqH+gCm5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/ujFpzVGdngSHrdVFZClAdS2Iz6A>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:50:21 -0000
I've reviewed this version and I think it's ready to publish. Barry On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote: > As requested by several people, this is the version that includes RFC Editor notes. > >> On 19 Jul 2017, at 15:45, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Javascript Object Notation Update WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format >> Author : Tim Bray >> Filename : draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04.txt >> Pages : 15 >> Date : 2017-07-18 >> >> Abstract: >> JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a lightweight, text-based, >> language-independent data interchange format. It was derived from >> the ECMAScript Programming Language Standard. JSON defines a small >> set of formatting rules for the portable representation of structured >> data. >> >> This document removes inconsistencies with other specifications of >> JSON, repairs specification errors, and offers experience-based >> interoperability guidance. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > json mailing list > json@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
- [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-… internet-drafts
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Julian Reschke
- [Json] Serializing to File? Re: I-D Action: draft… Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Pete Cordell
- [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON? Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON? Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON? Anders Rundgren