IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus on Whether or Not to Adopt Nomenclature Document(s) in the Charter

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 15 March 2014 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09B1A022D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gurKpQ1EYSlq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962D31A0229 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s2F1wU26012276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:58:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwi6Ha0r55vb3VNsgz40Bds6HYZ-aM9u-JwyVmoRDuZaWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:58:27 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <420F0699-9F27-435E-924C-28966A743EAF@vpnc.org>
References: <53238F2E.5010105@cisco.com> <CAHBU6itv0q7ZTrran+dKTcUxoSxNHYnND7yLmSPF35--iUMA+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwi6Ha0r55vb3VNsgz40Bds6HYZ-aM9u-JwyVmoRDuZaWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/x5LsgWb7kaHeSawz50zYXuSybbs
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus on Whether or Not to Adopt Nomenclature Document(s) in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 01:58:42 -0000

On Mar 14, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think RFC 6962 could be improved substantially with some greater adherence to some structure.

Could you maybe take that discussion to the trans working group? It is not relevant to this WG. Thanks!

--Paul Hoffman

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status