Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 30 May 2014 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400F51A0699 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySNJqXAOl2ef for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3671A046D for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id lc6so2768336vcb.16 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lxLUWg7MHhZv6foy+RncYPuZm8BsfgUD0VBdr91ChR0=; b=P3IqwkZXqGSWHS3AiGEhyOTbscGXpQLY3LhgRld88YbiImxEGdHD3ZG/vqjph6i5XM Lr+z4GpkA8dHDSDobhc1u1bl49H4RCvzGL/D8VBA2WH+EhIg6b38hw9+t0AMJloP7kxu kyTqhppEIDkJz3oYfM/vyc+0ToPMqm4QGr9rEjfziUFO+VdBMqYtPAGNBgXx1UyA+oiz zSf2X4JYcQIMICGCuTydDUH+7xGU94E0bj1leQb3Cuf1uu8AQZgfv5cDMIw4n1sO4cEl UhCAd3HjlxzMxMPX02O7kSR7t4XktMLnmB+pTJs9o8qC0xQ2/DN4TjoOUQk7C1N97VFC zSpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkozgufBeMpFUXAqTQfm4bIGNf6h/JQRGJvo27tQXkaDe9mnWYoWOzYfWTj6K1WBPW9KId+
X-Received: by 10.220.205.3 with SMTP id fo3mr3903522vcb.57.1401485941382; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.85.103.37]
In-Reply-To: <62E6DC51-2D3D-4C55-89D8-19810347A9FB@tzi.org>
References: <535EB3BF.8080606@cisco.com> <CAHBU6ivjF9ULW0yGSVdJi2D6QgUThuhym_ZhpgLM=cvLu=mAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CF841AAE.47D86%jhildebr@cisco.com> <CAHBU6itK5HtSTPWSsHsHUPja90emqU86LsgjrBorkqcUDivS2A@mail.gmail.com> <CF87EB9C.48BB0%jhildebr@cisco.com> <537A5BE0.3020406@cisco.com> <CF9FCEC9.4A4E7%jhildebr@cisco.com> <488AE66E-725D-40B3-9FDA-ADA1018BCF65@tzi.org> <CFA0F09E.4A609%jhildebr@cisco.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E115461FFE59@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <20140521020731.GG9283@mercury.ccil.org> <CFA21B5C.4A721%jhildebr@cisco.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1154629E87D@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CAHBU6isO7oooeN8rH8emx-xuOrs2yzBUrhyJNYYAyzK2-QfF0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOih-YO-ncbSc3dVv_O7uHfjRxCDjUpzHmkFG5Dj7kb-xg@mail.gmail.com> <5384C118.4060402@cisco.com> <14DB352D-3D0C-458A-90BE-38BCA8CC98DD@tzi.org> <CAHBU6isjZjfoga_g9efiK1L=Pf40ZQXg8War+k9JDM13quHPOQ@mail.gmail.com> <DF223160-A135-4B8E-A895-53A4BF63AA1E@tzi.org> <5384D0C2.7030407@cisco.com> <62E6DC51-2D3D-4C55-89D8-19810347A9FB@tzi.org>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:38:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6itsC5mKjY98Xw1o5d3iHXvTiWgY-OoRtraHokScE38Lew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c8c4b1b94804faa4df14
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/xfBh6kYu2l_lD06V4xz-1-i6UVs
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 21:39:08 -0000

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> ​​
>    ➧ In particular, an I-JSON sender MUST NOT expect a receiver to treat
> ​​
>    an integer whose absolute value is greater than 9007199254740992 (i.e.,
> ​​
>    that is outside the range [-2**53, 2**53], where ** stands for
> exponentiation)
> ​​
>    as an exact value.
>

​BTW, RFC7159 says: Note that when such software is used, numbers which are
integers and are in the range [-(2**53)+1, (2**53)-1] are interoperable in
the sense that implementations will agree exactly on their numeric values.​
 So for consistency we should adjust this language to use this range and
the absolute value of 9007199254740991 - right?
​​

​​

​​

>
> This then leads well into the next paragraph:
>
>    For applications such as cryptography, where much larger numbers are
>    reasonably required, it is RECOMMENDED to encode them in JSON string
>    values.  This requires that the receiving program understand the
>    intended semantic of the value.
>
> Maybe s/where…are/where exact interchange of…is/ in there for even more
> clarity.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>


-- 
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)