Re: [Json] more errata (references)

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975D91A021A for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hP8riHJ06W5m for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50E11A02A5 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq11so4786855vcb.28 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kqU/PRlia5euhCyrDghpTEKts7tjnGhwGGuUuDpd5iE=; b=J4INuiOh3hE0xmiVH0auLwocL8K2PE8oFPsoJsdZUpgeBVXGLyxfEgEUUFx9orcz6G DNqe3v6RRgOVQyBYbageewJh0YSQ9O8/pAX+FeDNTKdMbKZppV1bwAzAuJPElJAeZUSW 4fB7GqcLqgwnXqQdk23lbAW3BDVvqkoUjMGUH3KItWgRiMT0/EKvejFQ8XsqRLPsYfEW enVQ0M6l2MNY/KaA/KKGCkmFzIpE8Nd+MvVd+RXaZ/4Gz8EkHzXIpVM76J89KUjj2bUq DmWGQJaUrLVUKalCaNizL7Wg+sFc3qQJ9px4GZW2Emx1RNp9rZ9pL6QbouawiHBRFN+1 Uszg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkNp6bubTHMxJjhq5zpOAai6xUbuB0LI2WBLNlkLpBOwkI52m13oeTFIVTUlGlCUaieTsi
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.141.105 with SMTP id rn9mr441191vdb.44.1393954920241; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [130.129.159.69]
In-Reply-To: <F42BA498-0ABB-428E-8BE6-55DB150FDBEC@mnot.net>
References: <5316095B.5050201@gmx.de> <53160CEE.6010405@qti.qualcomm.com> <s83ch918lcb49vse9afpjmb2arhki2kh8m@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <53160F3E.1000408@qti.qualcomm.com> <F42BA498-0ABB-428E-8BE6-55DB150FDBEC@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:42:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuB4ppBLpHbKaUjSrj2htysFs8V5suAJhkGpAWLmv9s6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51ba307dab16904f3cb6b02
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/yUwENOretWcGmT7zq1ZOxMzYAGs
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] more errata (references)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:42:08 -0000

Minor production screwup, it’s in the XML: <seriesInfo name="RFC"
value="607"/>

Live with it, I say.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> 15.2 Informative References
>
>
> On 4 Mar 2014, at 5:37 pm, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3/4/14 5:31 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> >> * Pete Resnick wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/4/14 5:11 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hm.
> >>>>
> >>>>    [Err3607]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607,
> >>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
> >>>>
> >>>>    [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
> >>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
> >>>>
> >>>> Really??
> >>>>
> >>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3607>
> >>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=607>
> >>>
> >>> These two errata are on RFC 4627. Erratum 3607 is marked as "Held For
> >>> Document Update" and 607 is marked as "Verified".
> >>>
> >>> What's the question?
> >>>
> >> Read the reference text more carefully. RFC 3607 is "Chinese Lottery
> >> Cryptanalysis Revisited: The Internet as a Codebreaking Tool" and RFC
> >> 607 is "Comments on the File Transfer Protocol".
> >>
> >
> > Where did Julian's text above come from? The RFC Editor web site? This
> sounds like a report of a bug on the RFC Editor web site, displaying the
> wrong RFC number, not an issue for this WG.
> >
> > pr
> >
> > --
> > Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > json mailing list
> > json@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>