Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-01.txt
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 12 June 2016 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4F712D0C2 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKv8y42UJblw for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D350712D50C for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.166]) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D99C5A53; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter35-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.194]) by mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7gMkD3hZHE7; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 193.1.66.157
Received: from nar-3.local (unknown [193.1.66.157]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD61BC5A3C; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:12:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <575DB410.1090309@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:12:16 +0100
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
References: <20160612183925.5385.10856.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6is-7PwigBKJMr9VrS1xK2EQzb+6Vge+vEpnhWym+zf-ww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6is-7PwigBKJMr9VrS1xK2EQzb+6Vge+vEpnhWym+zf-ww@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/zcVZFdWCC1TIhgtceFL_azq5eQc>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:12:23 -0000
Tim Bray wrote: > ECMA 262 I think that's a regression. ECMA 262 is *not* defining JSON. (If you are looking for more sources of definitions, can I offer the documentation of, say, NSJSONSerialization?) Of course we'd like JSON implementations to implement JSON, but the direction of the arrow of normative referencing is very clear here. Grüße, Carsten
- [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-… internet-drafts
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Tim Bray