[Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78DB3A0827 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zyB3Gk8c8Q48 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4094D3A0811 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id h22so32845730lfu.2 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Xvm5ypuYS/m3F/PPhdCKuEfRY/rHw5IRWlrzEu83okg=; b=V4u0PT7L96doU2P4QuHtwSmHT5QlYSJu9aT5etOF46Czi3G0+vu+XfZpI86oYan7SQ VQVyy3JUY6mol1/V6yMPZVAJLXeyJpEw/Y3rKd6ZoeKvy9qOf0WzNMvXh0Av7J7g1j8S BncVyIsHhzDqjz4i/zLrRBp3GuzE/xLP4p5ITlONp/k48fGNbJRJZUH9lbzi9lQ3SgYe n1pVDCEtpMMn2OlLwgVAF4zuOO/aQEsfpCYoDwoH3mYHh4vYPu1yKzUVIPqJarVd0aaG skOIC+yWkloRyNUEuu8y9nqyRuHwbY/wVYoW6kzxGpWzb+2XE52Zfp/Y1QdOdMzkRaOV ex5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Xvm5ypuYS/m3F/PPhdCKuEfRY/rHw5IRWlrzEu83okg=; b=Ik3PlYrYqJZ590p1HIBd6Vu5f//0VVko421rkT4G3LFvqPZkaRR4j+QHmWHmQvacPf NwojMGEZEJ+T1fBJjYmLGk350rkr1STKUfmL+qbLFeViLVT480vBAAS7COpEW7xtQiu4 OOipZqUMd+jdSAK0tvgUtpxNn6zx4smkAJeYL/7YLrCqHl5NzARna8KDiJW2BTRg0P0K ZZDV36kA2kE5MoOUNwg4jBEN95CctJ9JSnReQiIEiWw2DOuN66n7W/japGfPMUziT0oi 5BcaqIFgAhDXWFjVh21DepVbYW2kZzr5QNBUa5kVnAqzXPoT6AzrNfnH4W1O9zcOoF86 S6EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ko9qZA2VpnlQZqo4RRrYzqzNLOWKPreowK6JJI35QPQXzEiQW rJsHa3IsdbZjSwPT4vn27jAu9n9lMprquMdmh0X22C9pstrznQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1C1PRVP9Wd7MHXc9QKboFchC7JEbIqymDv1+/gKQgj+zpm3Mui1gk/IqH8V8EmqkFO1rGGxg5pi4kfrKrF/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:495b:: with SMTP id l27mr10584636lfj.451.1608749807241; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:56:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isXOWxuNT2_kdo_ZBoqJpTyt59W+0-FMmjRvbPGLhNWNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: jsonpath@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb42d205b72640fa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/IbYkX6KP0x9nssWaBLqwUI7Nt24>
Subject: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:56:51 -0000
On behalf of James and myself: Thanks to everyone for the quick consensus on accepting the Carsten/Glyn combined draft for adoption by the WG, and special thanks to Glyn and Carsten for getting this pulled together. The next thing we need to do is get it checked in - James has made a repo in our project at https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath. We think the proper new name is draft-ietf-jsonpath-jsonpath-00 - does anyone disagree? After reaching out to all four people who edited previous drafts, James and I have asked Marko Mikulicic and Stefan Goessner to serve as co-editors for the WG going forward. It would be appreciated if our co-editors could fix up the name and have a look at the issues on Glyn's repo and migrate at least some of them over to our official project, applying editorial judgment about what deserves to be carried forward. As soon as the draft is in place, we're hoping to see a flurry of issues and PRs and looking forward to lively discussion of what a JSONPath really is and what we can most usefully say about it.
- [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Glyn Normington
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Julian Reschke
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Stefan Hagen
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Glyn Normington